ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2018
Identification of Microbial Dark Matter in Antarctic Environments.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biosignatures of diverse eukaryotic life from a Snowball Earth analogue environment in Antarctica.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Microbial dark matter spearheading the biogeochemical cycle in the Solar Lake of Taba, Egypt.Current research in microbial sciences · 2025Article
- Unveiling microbial guilds and symbiotic relationships in Antarctic sponge microbiomes.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Microbial community composition predicts bacterial production across ocean ecosystems.The ISME journal · 2024Article
- TerrANTALife 1.0 Biodiversity data checklist of known Antarctic terrestrial and freshwater life forms.Biodiversity data journal · 2024Article
- The Vestfold Hills are alive: characterising microbial and environmental dynamics in Old Wallow, eastern Antarctica.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Assigning the unassigned: A signature-based classification of rDNA metabarcodes reveals new deep-sea diversity.PloS one · 2024Article
- A thermophilic chemolithoautotrophic bacterial consortium suggests a mutual relationship between bacteria in extreme oligotrophic environments.Communications biology · 2023Article
- Review
- Soil substrate culturing approaches recover diverse members of Actinomycetota from desert soils of Herring Island, East Antarctica.Extremophiles : life under extreme conditions · 2022Article
- Survival strategies of an anoxic microbial ecosystem in Lake Untersee, a potential analog for Enceladus.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Functional Characterisation of Bile Metagenome: Study of Metagenomic Dark Matter.Microorganisms · 2021Article
- A network approach to elucidate and prioritize microbial dark matter in microbial communities.The ISME journal · 2021Article
- An Extensive Meta-Metagenomic Search Identifies SARS-CoV-2-Homologous Sequences in Pangolin Lung Viromes.mSphere · 2020Article
- High Culturable Bacterial Diversity From a European Desert: The Tabernas Desert.Frontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Uncovering the Uncultivated Majority in Antarctic Soils: Toward a Synergistic Approach.Frontiers in microbiology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Numerous studies have applied molecular techniques to understand the diversity, evolution, and ecological function of Antarctic bacteria and archaea. One common technique is sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene, which produces a nearly quantitative profile of community membership. However, the utility of this and similar approaches is limited by what is known about the evolution, physiology, and ecology of surveyed taxa. When representative genomes are available in public databases some of this information can be gleaned from genomic studies, and automated pipelines exist to carry out this task. Here the paprica metabolic inference pipeline was used to assess how well Antarctic microbial communities are represented by the available completed genomes. The NCBI's Sequence Read Archive (SRA) was searched for Antarctic datasets that used one of the Illumina platforms to sequence the 16S rRNA gene. These data were quality controlled and denoised to identify unique reads, then analyzed with paprica to determine the degree of overlap with the closest phylogenetic neighbor with a completely sequenced genome. While some unique reads had perfect mapping to 16S rRNA genes from completed genomes, the mean percent overlap for all mapped reads was 86.6%. When samples were grouped by environment, some environments appeared more or less well represented by the available genomes. For the domain Bacteria, seawater was particularly poorly represented with a mean overlap of 80.2%, while for the domain Archaea glacial ice was particularly poorly represented with an overlap of only 48.0% for a single sample. These findings suggest that a considerable effort is needed to improve the representation of Antarctic microbes in genome sequence databases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.