Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30619027›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2018

Implementation of a Central Sensorimotor Integration Test for Characterization of Human Balance Control During Stance.

Robert J Peterka, Charles F Murchison, Lucy Parrington, Peter C Fino, Laurie A King

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02748109 (Assessment and Rehabilitation of Central Sensory Impairments for Balance in mTBI), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02748109 nacompletednot on this map

Assessment and Rehabilitation of Central Sensory Impairments for Balance in mTBI

TypeinterventionalSponsorOregon Health and Science UniversityRan2016 to 2019Enrolled132ConditionsBrain InjuryArmsVestibular Rehabilitation + audio biofeedback, Vestibular Rehabilitation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Slow dynamics of human balance control.Scientific reports · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Robert J PeterkaDepartment of Neurology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, United States.
Charles F MurchisonDepartment of Neurology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, United States.
Lucy ParringtonDepartment of Neurology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, United States.
Peter C FinoDepartment of Neurology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, United States.
Laurie A KingDepartment of Neurology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, United States.
Oregon Health & Science University · USVA Portland Health Care System · US

Funding

Closing the gap between observational research and randomized trials for prevention of Alzheimer's Disease and dementiaR01AG057869 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GRAFF, REBECCA ELIZABETH, POWER, MELINDA C · 2018 to 2022
$3.9M
ADAPTION OF SPATIAL ORIENTATION IN LOCOMOTION &POSTURER01DC004082 · NIDCD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI HORAK, FAY BAHLING · 2000 to 2010
$3.4M
SENSORIMOTOR INTEGRATION IN HUMAN POSTURAL CONTROLR01AG017960 · NIA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI PETERKA, ROBERT J · 2000 to 2009
$2.3M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG017960NIA NIH HHS R01 AG057869NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC004082RRD VA I50 RX002361
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Balance during stance is regulated by active control mechanisms that continuously estimate body motion, via a "sensory integration" mechanism, and generate corrective actions, via a "sensory-to-motor transformation" mechanism. The balance control system can be modeled as a closed-loop feedback control system for which appropriate system identification methods are available to separately quantify the sensory integration and sensory-to-motor components of the system. A detailed, functionally meaningful characterization of balance control mechanisms has potential to improve clinical assessment and to provide useful tools for answering clinical research questions. However, many researchers and clinicians do not have the background to develop systems and methods appropriate for performing identification of balance control mechanisms. The purpose of this report is to provide detailed information on how to perform what we refer to as "central sensorimotor integration" (CSMI) tests on a commercially available balance test device (SMART EquiTest CRS, Natus Medical Inc, Seattle WA) and then to appropriately analyze and interpret results obtained from these tests. We describe methods to (1) generate pseudorandom stimuli that apply cyclically-repeated rotations of the stance surface and/or visual surround (2) measure and calibrate center-of-mass (CoM) body sway, (3) calculate frequency response functions (FRFs) that quantify the dynamic characteristics of stimulus-evoked CoM sway, (4) estimate balance control parameters that quantify sensory integration by measuring the relative contribution of different sensory systems to balance control (i.e., sensory weights), and (5) estimate balance control parameters that quantify sensory-to-motor transformation properties (i.e., feedback time delay and neural controller stiffness and damping parameters). Additionally, we present CSMI test results from 40 subjects (age range 21-59 years) with normal sensory function, 2 subjects with results illustrating deviations from normal balance function, and we summarize results from previous studies in subjects with vestibular deficits. A bootstrap analysis was used to characterize confidence limits on parameters from CSMI tests and to determine how test duration affected the confidence with which parameters can be measured. Finally, example results are presented that illustrate how various sensory and central balance deficits are revealed by CSMI testing.

Indexed as

balancebalance controlorientationsensorimotorsensory integrationstancesystem identification

Identifiers

PMID30619027
PMCPMC6300494
OpenAlexW2904260718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.