ArticleFrontiers in psychology2018
Executive Functions and Emotion-Attention Interaction in Assessment of Brain Health: Reliability of Repeated Testing With Executive RT Test and Correlation With BRIEF-A Questionnaire.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Inhibitory Control Training Improves Cold but Not Warm Cognition in Typically Developing Preschoolers.Child psychiatry and human development · 2026Trial
- Investigating the role of executive function in brain responses to infant crying among new parents.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2026Article
- The Relationship Between TikTok Usage and Executive Function Is Mediated by Problematic Social Media Use.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Exploring the impact of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation in subjects with and without burnout: Potential benefits for executive function and neural processing.Neuroimage. Reports · 2025Article
- The selective cognitive benefits of long-term Tai Chi practice on executive function of students: a study on young adults.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- FMR1 CGG Repeats and Stress Influence Self-Reported Cognitive Functioning in Mothers.American journal on intellectual and developmental disabilities · 2023Article
- Altered neural processes underlying executive function in occupational burnout-Basis for a novel EEG biomarker.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Article
- Article
- Threat-Modulation of Executive Functions-A Novel Biomarker of Depression?Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Article
- Emotional Modulation of Frontal Alpha Asymmetry - a Novel Biomarker of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021Article
- Reduced Frontal Nogo-N2 With Uncompromised Response Inhibition During Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation-More Efficient Cognitive Control?Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2020Article
- Exploring Idiographic Approaches to Children's Executive Function Performance: An Intensive Longitudinal Study.Journal for person-oriented research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Executive functions (EF) rely on intact fronto-subcortical networks. An insult, disorder or treatment compromising brain health may impair the functioning of these widespread networks and consequently disrupt EF. Changes in brain health due to treatment or disorder can be assessed by repeating an EF test at different time points, but practice effect may confound the results. In this study we examined reliability of repeated testing using a computer-based test of EF, Executive Reaction Time (RT) Test, that allows assessment of different executive functions and emotion-attention interaction. In addition, we investigated whether performance measures correlate with scores derived from a clinically validated questionnaire of executive functions, Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function, Adult version (BRIEF-A). Healthy subjects performed the test twice, 3-4 weeks apart. When the entire tests were compared, subjects were faster and their odds to make an error reflecting disruption of working memory was lower in the second test. When two (error analysis) or four (RT analysis) blocks out of total eight test blocks were removed from the beginning of the test, the differences disappeared. In the first test emotional distractors prolonged RTs of younger, but not older, participants. In the second test emotional distractors had no effect on RTs of either age group. RTs correlated with Global Executive Composite score of BRIEF-A. Test-retest reliability analysis showed that the Executive RT Test is reliable in repeated testing with 0.83 intraclass correlation coefficient for RTs, 0.72 for total errors and 0.68 for working memory related errors. In summary, performance speed in the Executive RT Test correlate with subjective evaluations of executive functions and is reliable in repeated assessment when enough practice is ensured before the actual test. Thus, the Executive RT test holds promise as a potential indicator of brain health reflecting level of executive functions linked with daily life demands as well as typical emotion-attention interaction or possible aberrations in it.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.