Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30618726›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2018

Effects of Visual and Acoustic Distraction on Driving Behavior and EEG in Young and Older Car Drivers: A Driving Simulation Study.

Melanie Karthaus, Edmund Wascher, Stephan Getzmann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Simulated driving behavior over the adult age span.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Driving Attention State Detection Based on GRU-EEGNet.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Are Your Eyes "on the Road"? Findings from the 2019 National Study on Vision and Driving Safety in Spain.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Melanie KarthausIfADo - Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Dortmund, Germany.
Edmund WascherIfADo - Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Dortmund, Germany.
Stephan GetzmannIfADo - Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Dortmund, Germany.
TU Dortmund University · DELeibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Driving safety depends on the drivers' attentional focus on the driving task. Especially in complex situations, distraction due to secondary stimuli can impair driving performance. The inhibition of distractors or inadequate prepotent responses to irrelevant stimuli requires cognitive control, which is assumed to be reduced with increasing age. The present EEG study investigated the effects of secondary acoustic and visual stimuli on driving performance of younger and older car drivers in a driving simulator task. The participants had to respond to brake lights of a preceding car under different distraction conditions and with varying task difficulties. Overall, the anticipation of high demanding tasks affected braking response behavior in young and especially in older adults, who showed reduced cognitive control to task-relevant braking stimuli, as reflected by a smaller P3b. In a more easy (perception only) task, simultaneously presented acoustic stimuli accelerated braking response times (RTs) in young and older adults, which was associated with a pronounced P2. In contrast, secondary visual stimuli increased braking RTs in older adults, associated with a reduced P3b. In a more difficult (discrimination) task, braking response behavior was impaired by the presence of secondary acoustic and visual stimuli in young and older drivers. Braking RT increased (and the P3b decreased), especially when the responses to the secondary stimuli had to be suppressed. This negative effect was more pronounced with visual secondary stimuli, and especially so in the older group. In sum, the results suggest an impaired resistance to distractor interference and a reduced inhibition of prepotent responses in older drivers. This was most pronounced when the processing of task-relevant and irrelevant stimuli engage the same mental resources, for example, by sharing the same stimulus modality.

Indexed as

agingcognitive controldistractiondrivingEEG

Identifiers

PMID30618726
PMCPMC6305392
OpenAlexW2904211520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.