ArticleFrontiers in neuroinformatics2018
Epileptic Seizure Detection Based on EEG Signals and CNN.
Article in Frontiers in neuroinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
89 citing papers in PubMed, 477 citations in OpenAlex.
- CNN-Autoformer: Automated EEG-Based Seizure Detection and Localization Using Hybrid Deep Learning.Biomedical signal processing and control · 2026Article
- Enhancing EEG based cognitive state classification using graph Fourier transform.AIMS neuroscience · 2026Article
- Comprehensive review of machine learning and deep learning techniques for epileptic seizure detection and prediction based on neuroimaging modalities.Visual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art · 2025Review
- EEG-Based Local-Global Dimensional Emotion Recognition Using Electrode Clusters, EEG Deformer, and Temporal Convolutional Network.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Annotating neurophysiologic data at scale with optimized human input.Journal of neural engineering · 2025Article
- Assistive Artificial Intelligence in Epilepsy and Its Impact on Epilepsy Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.Brain sciences · 2025Review
- GEM-CRAP: a fusion architecture for focal seizure detection.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Recurrent and convolutional neural networks in classification of EEG signal for guided imagery and mental workload detection.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- An Efficient Approach for Detection of Various Epileptic Waves Having Diverse Forms in Long Term EEG Based on Deep Learning.Brain topography · 2025Article
- Synchronization-based graph spatio-temporal attention network for seizure prediction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Detection of latent brain states from spontaneous neural activity in the amygdala.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- CMTS-GNN: a cross-modal temporal-spectral graph neural network with cognitive network explainability.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Modeling of whole brain sleep electroencephalogram using deep oscillatory neural network.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2025Article
- A novel dual-branch network for comprehensive spatiotemporal information integration for EEG-based epileptic seizure detection.PloS one · 2025Article
- Epilepsy detection based on spatiotemporal feature interaction fusion of EEG signals.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- An adaptive multi-graph neural network with multimodal feature fusion learning for MDD detection.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Seizure Onset Zone Detection Based on Convolutional Neural Networks and EEG Signals.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- Electrographic monitoring for seizure detection in the neonatal unit: current status and future direction.Pediatric research · 2024Review
- Beat-by-Beat Estimation of Hemodynamic Parameters in Left Ventricle Based on Phonocardiogram and Photoplethysmography Signals Using a Deep Learning Model: Preliminary Study.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epilepsy is a neurological disorder that affects approximately fifty million people according to the World Health Organization. While electroencephalography (EEG) plays important roles in monitoring the brain activity of patients with epilepsy and diagnosing epilepsy, an expert is needed to analyze all EEG recordings to detect epileptic activity. This method is obviously time-consuming and tedious, and a timely and accurate diagnosis of epilepsy is essential to initiate antiepileptic drug therapy and subsequently reduce the risk of future seizures and seizure-related complications. In this study, a convolutional neural network (CNN) based on raw EEG signals instead of manual feature extraction was used to distinguish ictal, preictal, and interictal segments for epileptic seizure detection. We compared the performances of time and frequency domain signals in the detection of epileptic signals based on the intracranial Freiburg and scalp CHB-MIT databases to explore the potential of these parameters. Three types of experiments involving two binary classification problems (interictal vs. preictal and interictal vs. ictal) and one three-class problem (interictal vs. preictal vs. ictal) were conducted to explore the feasibility of this method. Using frequency domain signals in the Freiburg database, average accuracies of 96.7, 95.4, and 92.3% were obtained for the three experiments, while the average accuracies for detection in the CHB-MIT database were 95.6, 97.5, and 93% in the three experiments. Using time domain signals in the Freiburg database, the average accuracies were 91.1, 83.8, and 85.1% in the three experiments, while the signal detection accuracies in the CHB-MIT database were only 59.5, 62.3, and 47.9% in the three experiments. Based on these results, the three cases are effectively detected using frequency domain signals. However, the effective identification of the three cases using time domain signals as input samples is achieved for only some patients. Overall, the classification accuracies of frequency domain signals are significantly increased compared to time domain signals. In addition, frequency domain signals have greater potential than time domain signals for CNN applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.