ArticleFrontiers in neuroinformatics2018
Reproducible Neural Network Simulations: Statistical Methods for Model Validation on the Level of Network Activity Data.
Article in Frontiers in neuroinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biophysical modeling reveals how recording geometry shapes representations of cortical activity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Bridging Model and Experiment in Systems Neuroscience with Cleo: The Closed-Loop, Electrophysiology, and Optophysiology Simulation Testbed.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026Article
- Bridging model and experiment in systems neuroscience with Cleo: the Closed-Loop, Electrophysiology, and Optophysiology simulation testbed.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Metadata practices for simulation workflows.Scientific data · 2025Article
- NESTML: a generic modeling language and code generation tool for the simulation of spiking neural networks with advanced plasticity rules.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2025Article
- A modular and adaptable analysis pipeline to compare slow cerebral rhythms across heterogeneous datasets.Cell reports methods · 2024Article
- Reproducibility of biophysical in silico neuron states and spikes from event-based partial histories.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- neuroAIx-Framework: design of future neuroscience simulation systems exhibiting execution of the cortical microcircuit model 20× faster than biological real-time.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2023Article
- Virtual Intelligence: A Systematic Review of the Development of Neural Networks in Brain Simulation Units.Brain sciences · 2022Review
- Connectivity concepts in neuronal network modeling.PLoS computational biology · 2022Review
- A System-on-Chip Based Hybrid Neuromorphic Compute Node Architecture for Reproducible Hyper-Real-Time Simulations of Spiking Neural Networks.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2022Article
- Bringing Anatomical Information into Neuronal Network Models.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022Article
- A Modular Workflow for Performance Benchmarking of Neuronal Network Simulations.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2022Article
- EDEN: A High-Performance, General-Purpose, NeuroML-Based Neural Simulator.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2022Article
- Mapping and Validating a Point Neuron Model on Intel's Neuromorphic Hardware Loihi.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Mapping and Validating a Point Neuron Model on Intel's Neuromorphic Hardware Loihi.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2022Article
- The Unexplored Territory of Neural Models: Potential Guides for Exploring the Function of Metabotropic Neuromodulation.Neuroscience · 2021Review
- Simulating the Cortical Microcircuit Significantly Faster Than Real Time on the IBM INC-3000 Neural Supercomputer.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- Dynamical Characteristics of Recurrent Neuronal Networks Are Robust Against Low Synaptic Weight Resolution.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- Acceleration of the SPADE Method Using a Custom-Tailored FP-Growth Implementation.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Computational neuroscience relies on simulations of neural network models to bridge the gap between the theory of neural networks and the experimentally observed activity dynamics in the brain. The rigorous validation of simulation results against reference data is thus an indispensable part of any simulation workflow. Moreover, the availability of different simulation environments and levels of model description require also validation of model implementations against each other to evaluate their equivalence. Despite rapid advances in the formalized description of models, data, and analysis workflows, there is no accepted consensus regarding the terminology and practical implementation of validation workflows in the context of neural simulations. This situation prevents the generic, unbiased comparison between published models, which is a key element of enhancing reproducibility of computational research in neuroscience. In this study, we argue for the establishment of standardized statistical test metrics that enable the quantitative validation of network models on the level of the population dynamics. Despite the importance of validating the elementary components of a simulation, such as single cell dynamics, building networks from validated building blocks does not entail the validity of the simulation on the network scale. Therefore, we introduce a corresponding set of validation tests and present an example workflow that practically demonstrates the iterative model validation of a spiking neural network model against its reproduction on the SpiNNaker neuromorphic hardware system. We formally implement the workflow using a generic Python library that we introduce for validation tests on neural network activity data. Together with the companion study (Trensch et al., 2018), the work presents a consistent definition, formalization, and implementation of the verification and validation process for neural network simulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.