Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30618486›Full record

ArticleHealth services insights2018

Development and Testing of the interRAI Acute Care: A Standardized Assessment Administered by Nurses for Patients Admitted to Acute Care.

Leonard C Gray, Elizabeth Beattie, Veronique M Boscart, Amanda Henderson, Yvonne C Hornby-Turner, Ruth E Hubbard, Susan Wood, Nancye M Peel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services insights, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Leonard C GrayCentre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Elizabeth BeattieSchool of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Veronique M BoscartSchlegel Centre for Advancing Seniors Care, Conestoga College, Kitchener, ON, Canada.
Amanda HendersonNursing Practice Development Unit, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Yvonne C Hornby-TurnerCentre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4722-8104
Ruth E HubbardCentre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Susan WoodQuality and Patient Safety, Canterbury and West Coast District Health Boards, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Nancye M PeelCentre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3038-8881
The University of Queensland · AUCanterbury District Health Board · NZConestoga College · CAPrincess Alexandra Hospital · AUQueensland University of Technology · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderpinning standards for developing comprehensive care in hospital is the need to identify, early in the admission process, functional and psychosocial issues which affect patient outcomes. Despite the value of comprehensive assessment of patients on admission, the process is often sub-optimal due to a lack of standardized assessment practices. This project aimed to develop a concise, integrated assessment for patients admitted to acute care and test its psychometric properties.

methodsTwo international expert panels of clinicians and health scientists collaborated to establish design parameters. Using clinical observations and a variety of derivative applications sourced from the interRAI research collaborative repository, the panels constructed a draft instrument to examine feasibility, resource requirements, and inter-rater reliability. Field testing was conducted in Australia and Canada. Next, the system was revised to its final form, the interRAI Acute Care, after feedback and review from international interRAI members.

resultsConstructed using 56 items, the interRAI Acute Care required a median of 15 minutes to complete. Inter-rater reliability tested on 130 paired assessments was substantial to almost perfect for 78% of the clinical items and moderate for the remaining 22% of items. A subset of 30 items from the admission assessment comprised the discharge assessment. DISCUSSION: The interRAI Acute Care has been shown to be an efficient nursing assessment instrument with good psychometric properties. Implementation in a digital environment will enable documentation and care planning to comply with standards for quality of care in the general adult hospital population.

Indexed as

acute careinstrument developmentNursing assessmentquality of carerisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID30618486
PMCPMC6299328
OpenAlexW2904041676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.