ArticleSignal processing2019
Real-Time Filtering with Sparse Variations for Head Motion in Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Article in Signal processing, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Estimating a time-varying signal, such as head motion from magnetic resonance imaging data, becomes particularly challenging in the face of other temporal dynamics such as functional activation. This paper describes a new Kalman filter-like framework that includes a sparse residual term in the measurement model. This additional term allows the extended Kalman filter to generate real-time motion estimates suitable for prospective motion correction when such dynamics occur. An iterative augmented Lagrangian algorithm similar to the alterating direction method of multipliers implements the update step for this Kalman filter. This paper evaluates the accuracy and convergence rate of this iterative method for small and large motion in terms of its sensitivity to parameter selection. The included experiment on a simulated functional magnetic resonance imaging acquisition demonstrates that the resulting method improves the maximum Youden's J index of the time series analysis by 2-3% versus retrospective motion correction, while the sensitivity index increases from 4.3 to 5.4 when combining prospective and retrospective correction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.