Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30618478›Full record

ArticleSignal processing2019

Real-Time Filtering with Sparse Variations for Head Motion in Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Daniel S Weller, Douglas C Noll, Jeffrey A Fessler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Signal processing, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel S WellerUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA 22904.
Douglas C NollUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA 48109.
Jeffrey A FesslerUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA 48109.

Funding

Fast Functional MRI with Sparse Sampling and Model-Based ReconstructionR01EB023618 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI FESSLER, JEFFREY A, NOLL, DOUGLAS C · 2017 to 2020
$1.5M
Motion-Robust Methods for Rapid Pediatric MRI without SedationR21EB022309 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI MEYER, CRAIG H · 2016 to 2018
$539k
Adaptive Techniques for Robust High-Resolution Functional Magnetic Resonance ImagF32EB015914 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI WELLER, DANIEL STUART · 2012 to 2013
$96k
NIBIB NIH HHS F32 EB015914NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB023618NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB022309
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Estimating a time-varying signal, such as head motion from magnetic resonance imaging data, becomes particularly challenging in the face of other temporal dynamics such as functional activation. This paper describes a new Kalman filter-like framework that includes a sparse residual term in the measurement model. This additional term allows the extended Kalman filter to generate real-time motion estimates suitable for prospective motion correction when such dynamics occur. An iterative augmented Lagrangian algorithm similar to the alterating direction method of multipliers implements the update step for this Kalman filter. This paper evaluates the accuracy and convergence rate of this iterative method for small and large motion in terms of its sensitivity to parameter selection. The included experiment on a simulated functional magnetic resonance imaging acquisition demonstrates that the resulting method improves the maximum Youden's J index of the time series analysis by 2-3% versus retrospective motion correction, while the sensitivity index increases from 4.3 to 5.4 when combining prospective and retrospective correction.

Indexed as

image processingKalman filteringmagnetic resonance imagingregistrationsparsity

Identifiers

PMID30618478
PMCPMC6319923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.