Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30617924›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2019

SEOM clinical guidelines in advanced and recurrent breast cancer (2018).

J I Chacón López-Muñiz, L de la Cruz Merino, J Gavilá Gregori, E Martínez Dueñas, M Oliveira, M A Seguí Palmer, I Álvarez López, S Antolin Novoa, M Bellet Ezquerra, S López-Tarruella Cobo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Shared decision making in breast cancer treatment guidelines: Development of a quality assessment tool and a systematic review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Review of concepts in therapeutic decision-making in HER2-negative luminal metastatic breast cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Clinical experience and satisfaction in patients with advanced breast cancer participating in the abemaciclib patient support program in Spain: a prospective observational study.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Observational
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Assessing the methodological strengths and limitations of the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) guidelines: a critical appraisal using AGREE II and AGREE-REX tool.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Review
  9. Review of imaging techniques for evaluating morphological and functional responses to the treatment of bone metastases in prostate and breast cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2022
    Review
  10. Expert consensus to optimize the treatment of elderly patients with luminal metastatic breast cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. SEOM guidelines 2018.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

J I Chacón López-MuñizServicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital Virgen de la Salud, Avda. de Barber, 30, 45004, Toledo, Spain. jignaciochacon@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1286-6157
L de la Cruz MerinoServicio de Oncología Médica, Medicine Department, Hospital Virgen Macarena, University of Sevilla, Seville, Spain.
J Gavilá GregoriServicio de Oncología Médica, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain.
E Martínez DueñasServicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital Provincial de Castellón, Castellón, Spain.
M OliveiraVall d'Hebron University Hospital and Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain.
M A Seguí PalmerServicio de Oncología Médica, Corporació Sanitaria Parc Tauli, Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain.
I Álvarez LópezServicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario Donostia/Donostiako Unibertsitate Ospitalea, Donostia, Spain.
S Antolin NovoaServicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain.
M Bellet EzquerraVall d'Hebron University Hospital and Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain.
S López-Tarruella CoboServicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón (IiSGM), Universidad Complutense, CiberOnc, GEICAM, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the metastasic breast cancer is still an incurable disease, recent advances have increased significantly the time to progression and the overall survival. However, too much information has been produced in the last 2 years, so a well-based guideline is a valuable document in treatment decision making. The SEOM guidelines are intended to make evidence-based recommendations on how to manage patients with advanced and recurrent breast cancer to achieve the best patient outcomes based on a rational use of the currently available therapies. To assign a level of certainty and a grade of recommendation the United States Preventive Services Task Force guidelines methodology was selected as reference.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsClinical Trials as TopicCombined Modality TherapyDisease ManagementFemaleHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPractice Guidelines as TopicPrognosisSocieties, MedicalAdvancedBreast cancerGuidelinesLoco-regional recurrenceSEOM

Identifiers

PMID30617924
PMCPMC6339670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.