Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30617861›Full record

ArticleMycorrhiza2019

Plant-mediated partner discrimination in ectomycorrhizal mutualisms.

Laura Bogar, Kabir Peay, Ari Kornfeld, Julia Huggins, Sara Hortal, Ian Anderson, Peter Kennedy

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Mycorrhiza, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Photosynthetic product allocations ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Laura BogarDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, 371 Serra Mall, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA. lbogar@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6121-2224
Kabir PeayDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, 371 Serra Mall, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Ari KornfeldDepartment of Global Ecology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Julia HugginsDepartment of Plant & Microbial Biology, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, 55108, USA.
Sara HortalHawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Hawkesbury Campus, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia.
Ian AndersonHawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Hawkesbury Campus, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia.
Peter KennedyDepartment of Plant & Microbial Biology, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, 55108, USA.
Stanford University · USUniversity of Minnesota · USWestern Sydney University · AUCarnegie Institution for Science · US

Funding

Center for Computational, Evolutionary and Human Genomics, Stanford University Predoctoral FellowshipMycological Society of San Francisco Graduate ScholarshipNational Science Foundation 1554375National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although ectomycorrhizal fungi have well-recognized effects on ecological processes ranging from plant community dynamics to carbon cycling rates, it is unclear if plants are able to actively influence the structure of these fungal communities. To address this knowledge gap, we performed two complementary experiments to determine (1) whether ectomycorrhizal plants can discriminate among potential fungal partners, and (2) to what extent the plants might reward better mutualists. In experiment 1, split-root Larix occidentalis seedlings were inoculated with spores from three Suillus species (S. clintonianus, S. grisellus, and S. spectabilis). In experiment 2, we manipulated the symbiotic quality of Suillus brevipes isolates on split-root Pinus muricata seedlings by changing the nitrogen resources available, and used carbon-13 labeling to track host investment in fungi. In experiment 1, we found that hosts can discriminate in multi-species settings. The split-root seedlings inhibited colonization by S. spectabilis whenever another fungus was available, despite similar benefits from all three fungi. In experiment 2, we found that roots and fungi with greater nitrogen supplies received more plant carbon. Our results suggest that plants may be able to regulate this symbiosis at a relatively fine scale, and that this regulation can be integrated across spatially separated portions of a root system.

Indexed as

SymbiosisLarixMycorrhizaePinusSeedlingsSoil MicrobiologyEctomycorrhizaLarix occidentalisPartner choicePinus muricataStable isotope enrichmentSuillus

Identifiers

PMID30617861
OpenAlexW2911037287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.