ArticleHNO2019
[Neck dissection-Surgical treatment of cervical lymphatic drainage pathways].
Article in HNO, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Barbed suture in neck dissection: a randomized clinical study on efficacy, safety and aesthetic outcome.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024Trial
- An effective method to reduce lymphatic drainage post-lateral cervical lymph node dissection of differentiated thyroid cancer: a retrospective analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2022Article
- Oncological Analysis and Surgical Outcomes in Postcricoid Carcinoma: A 14 Years Retrospective Study.Cancers · 2022Article
- Total Laryngectomy-Still Cutting-Edge?Cancers · 2021Review
- Rational surgical neck management in total laryngectomy for advanced stage laryngeal squamous cell carcinomas.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2021Article
- [Laryngectomy-still state of the art?]HNO · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neck dissection (ND) is an essential component of treatment in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The extent of ND depends on primary tumor location and T and N stage. Trials have demonstrated improved survival for cN+ status with therapeutic ND as well as for cN0 status with selective ND if the primary has a high incidence of occult metastasis. The accuracy of the procedure is of prognostic relevance. In the prognostic model of the TNM classification, the parameter "N" does not only reflect the number of affected lymph nodes, but also their size and extranodal tumor extension. Due to its better prognosis, a positive human papillomavirus (HPV) status is also incorporated in the present TNM classification. In order to minimize morbidity after ND, one seeks to limit its extent without reducing survival time. To this aim, sentinel node biopsy or surveillance with positron-emission computed tomography (PET-CT) in cN0 necks or after primary radio(chemo)therapy are being investigated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.