Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30617624›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutical research2019

Impact of Older Age on the Exposure of Paclitaxel: a Population Pharmacokinetic Study.

Marie-Rose B S Crombag, Aurelia H M de Vries Schultink, Stijn L W Koolen, Sophie Wijngaard, Markus Joerger, Jan H M Schellens, Thomas P C Dorlo, Nielka P van Erp, Ron H J Mathijssen, Jos H Beijnen and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Marie-Rose B S CrombagDepartment of Pharmacy &Pharmacology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek - Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066, CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. m.crombag@nki.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2241-252X
Aurelia H M de Vries SchultinkDepartment of Pharmacy &Pharmacology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek - Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066, CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Stijn L W KoolenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Sophie WijngaardDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Markus JoergerDepartment of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Cantonal Hospital, St Gallen, Switzerland.
Jan H M SchellensDivision of Pharmacology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Thomas P C DorloDepartment of Pharmacy &Pharmacology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek - Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066, CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Nielka P van ErpDepartment of Pharmacy and Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Ron H J MathijssenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Jos H BeijnenDepartment of Pharmacy &Pharmacology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek - Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066, CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Alwin D R HuitemaDepartment of Pharmacy &Pharmacology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek - Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066, CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLimited available data suggest that older patients are more prone to develop paclitaxel-induced toxicity than their younger peers. It remains unclear whether this is related to age-dependent pharmacokinetics (PK) of paclitaxel. Primary objective of this study was to determine the influence of older age on the PK of paclitaxel.

methodsPK data of patients aged ≥70 years who received paclitaxel intravenously at the Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI) and the Radboud University Medical Center between September 2012 and May 2017 were collected. These prospectively collected data were pooled with previously published databases from multiple clinical trials conducted at the NKI and Erasmus MC Cancer Institute. A previously developed 3-compartment population PK model with saturable distribution and elimination was used to describe paclitaxel plasma concentration-time data. Hereafter, influence of age on paclitaxel PK was assessed in a previously established full covariate model.

resultsIn total, paclitaxel PK data from 684 patients were available, consisting of 166 patients ≥70 years (24%). Median age of the cohort was 61 years (range 18 to 84 years). The impact of age, either treated as a continuous or dichotomous covariate (<70 versus ≥70 years), on the elimination of paclitaxel was only marginal but statistically significant (both p < 0.001 with no clinically relevant decrease in interindividual variability). For a typical patient, maximal elimination capacity decreased by only 5% for a 10-year increment of age.

conclusionIn this extensive multi-center dataset, which included a considerable number of older patients, older age had no clinically relevant impact on paclitaxel PK.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicDatasets as TopicFemaleHumansInfusions, IntravenousMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsNetherlandsPaclitaxelProspective StudiesAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicPaclitaxelage differencesolder patientspaclitaxelpharmacokinetics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.