Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30617514›Full record

ArticlePediatric radiology2019

Microwave ablation of osteoid osteoma: initial experience and efficacy.

Elliot S Rinzler, Giridhar M Shivaram, Dennis W Shaw, Eric J Monroe, Kevin S H Koo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A review of the development of histotripsy for extremity tumor ablation with a canine comparative oncology model to inform human treatments.International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Osteoid osteoma: which is the best mininvasive treatment option?European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elliot S RinzlerDepartment of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Seattle Children's Hospital, M/S MA.7.220, PO Box 5371, Seattle, WA, 98145, USA. srinzler@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9209-1357
Giridhar M ShivaramDepartment of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Seattle Children's Hospital, M/S MA.7.220, PO Box 5371, Seattle, WA, 98145, USA.
Dennis W ShawDepartment of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Seattle Children's Hospital, M/S MA.7.220, PO Box 5371, Seattle, WA, 98145, USA.
Eric J MonroeDepartment of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Seattle Children's Hospital, M/S MA.7.220, PO Box 5371, Seattle, WA, 98145, USA.
Kevin S H KooDepartment of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Seattle Children's Hospital, M/S MA.7.220, PO Box 5371, Seattle, WA, 98145, USA.
Seattle Children's Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImage-guided percutaneous microwave ablation has been used to treat adult osteoid osteomas but has not been thoroughly evaluated in the pediatric population.

objectiveTo evaluate the technical feasibility and clinical efficacy of microwave ablation to treat osteoid osteomas in pediatric patients. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe electronic medical record and imaging archive were reviewed for 24 consecutive patients who had undergone microwave ablation of osteoid osteomas between January 1, 2015, and May 31, 2018, at a single tertiary care pediatric hospital. All patients were diagnosed by clinical and imaging criteria, and referred by a pediatric orthopedic surgeon after failing conservative management with pain medication. The average age of the patients was 13.3 years (range: 3-18 years), and the average size of the osteoid osteoma nidus was 8.8 mm (range: 5-22 mm). Technical success was defined as placement of the microwave antenna at the distal margin of the lesion nidus and achievement of the target ablation temperature. Clinical findings were assessed pre- and post-ablation and clinical success was defined as complete relief of pain without pain medication at 1-month follow-up. The number and severity of complications were also documented.

resultsClinical success was achieved in 100% of patients (24/24), with all reporting complete cessation of pain medication use 1 week after treatment and 0/10 pain at 1 month. There were 4 minor complications (17%) including access site numbness and a minor soft-tissue infection. There were no major complications.

conclusionMicrowave ablation is a technically feasible and clinically effective treatment for pediatric osteoid osteomas.

Indexed as

AdolescentBone NeoplasmsCatheter AblationChildChild, PreschoolCone-Beam Computed TomographyFemaleHumansMaleMicrowavesOsteoma, OsteoidRadiography, InterventionalRetrospective StudiesBoneChildrenInterventional radiologyMicrowave ablationOsteoid osteoma

Identifiers

PMID30617514
OpenAlexW2910578947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.