Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30617483›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2019

Prognostic value of MRI in assessing extramural venous invasion in rectal cancer: multi-readers' diagnostic performance.

Jae Seok Bae, Se Hyung Kim, Bo Yun Hur, Won Chang, Juil Park, Hye Eun Park, Jung Ho Kim, Hyo-Jin Kang, Mi Hye Yu, Joon Koo Han

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Development of a nomogram for predicting extramural venous invasion in colon cancer using spectral CT multiparameter imaging.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Jae Seok BaeDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea.
Se Hyung KimDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea. shkim7071@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1462-9689
Bo Yun HurDepartment of Radiology, National Cancer Center, Seoul, South Korea.
Won ChangDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea.
Juil ParkDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea.
Hye Eun ParkDepartment of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Jung Ho KimDepartment of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Hyo-Jin KangDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea.
Mi Hye YuDepartment of Radiology, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Joon Koo HanDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea.
Seoul National University · KRSeoul National University Hospital · KRKonkuk University · KRNational Cancer Center · KRNew Generation University College · ETSeoul National University Bundang Hospital · KR

Funding

Institute for Information and communications Technology Promotion NRF-2016R1A2B4007762Seoul National University Hospital 03-2016-450
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study was conducted in order to determine the prognostic value of MRI for extramural venous invasion (EMVI) in rectal cancer compared to pathology and to assess the diagnostic performance of multireaders.

methodsWe retrospectively enrolled 222 patients (M:F = 148:74; mean age ± standard deviation, 61.5 ± 12 years) with histopathologically proven rectal cancers who underwent preoperative MRI between 2007 and 2016. Among them, 74 patients had positive EMVI on pathology (pEMVI) and 148 patients had negative pEMVI. Three radiologists with 7 (reviewer 1), 3 (reviewer 2), and 1 (reviewer 3) year of experience in rectal MR imaging determined the presence of EMVI on MRI (mrEMVI) using a 5-point grading system. Using histopathologic results as the reference standard, radiologists' performances were analyzed and compared with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. For assessment of interobserver variation, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used. Lastly, Kaplan-Meier estimation and Cox proportional hazard models were used for survival analysis.

resultsThe area under the ROC curve (AUC) was highest in reviewer 1 (0.829), followed by reviewer 2 (0.798) and reviewer 3 (0.658). Differences in AUCs between reviewer 1 or 2 and reviewer 3 were statistically significant (p < 0.001). ICC was substantial between reviewers 1 and 2. Overall survival (OS) was significantly different according to the positive circumferential resection margin, adjuvant treatment, and the presence of mrEMVI, but not by the presence of pEMVI.

conclusionsFor experienced radiologists, the diagnostic performance of mrEMVI was good, resulting in better prediction of OS than with pEMVI, with substantial interobserver agreement. KEY POINTS: • When read by experienced radiologists, MR can provide reliable diagnostic performance in assessing EMVI for patients with rectal cancer. • Positive mrEMVI is an adverse prognostic factor of overall survival and may influence the clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overArea Under CurveBlood VesselsChemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantClinical CompetenceFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessObserver VariationBlood vesselsChemoradiotherapyMagnetic resonance imagingPrognosisRectal neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID30617483
OpenAlexW2909774483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.