Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30617479›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2019

Diagnostic value of the acute angle between the prestenotic and poststenotic duodenum in neonatal annular pancreas.

Boyang Yang, Fan He, Qiuming He, Zhe Wang, Qian Fang, Wei Zhong, Hongying Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Boyang YangDepartment of Medical Ultrasonics, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, No. 9 Jin Sui Road, Guangzhou, 510623, China.
Fan HeDepartment of Radiology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510623, China.
Qiuming HeDepartment of Neonatal Surgery and Neonatal Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510623, China.
Zhe WangDepartment of Neonatal Surgery and Neonatal Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510623, China.
Qian FangDepartment of Medical Ultrasonics, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, No. 9 Jin Sui Road, Guangzhou, 510623, China.
Wei ZhongDepartment of Neonatal Surgery and Neonatal Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510623, China. gzfezw@163.com.
Hongying WangDepartment of Medical Ultrasonics, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, No. 9 Jin Sui Road, Guangzhou, 510623, China. gzfe1122@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8107-3492
Guangzhou Medical University · CNGuangzhou Women and Children Medical Center · CN

Funding

Guangzhou Institute of Pediatrics/ Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center IP-2018-015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo analyze the ability of upper gastrointestinal (GI) saline-contrast ultrasound (US) to detect neonatal annular pancreas.

methodsSixty-two neonates, who presented duodenal obstruction and were examined by upper GI saline-contrast US before treatment, were retrospectively analyzed and categorized into four groups according to their final diagnosis: group A, annular pancreas (n = 28); group B, duodenal atresia (n = 2); group C, descending duodenal septum (n = 25); and group D, normal (n = 7). The ultrasonic characteristics were analyzed that especially focused on whether the angle between the prestenotic and poststenotic descending duodenum (at or below a derived cutoff) could identify neonatal annular pancreas.

resultsTo detect annular pancreas using the concave contour of the distal prestenotic duodenum, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were determined at 71.4%, 100%, 100%, and 80.9%, respectively. When using the hyperechogenic band around the constricted duodenum, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were determined at 82.1%, 94.1%, 92%, and 86.5%, respectively. For using the 40.7° acute angle cutoff between prestenotic and poststenotic descending duodenum, the values of sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were determined at 100%, 97.1%, 96.6%, and 100%, respectively, of which the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.979.

conclusionsUpper GI saline-contrast US has a lower possibility for misdiagnosis of neonatal annular pancreas when considering the acute angle between the prestenotic and poststenotic descending duodenum. KEY POINTS: • This study includes the largest series of neonates with annular pancreas of which the characteristics were analyzed using the upper GI saline-contrast US. • Neonatal annular pancreas may be diagnosed by the characteristics-concave contour of the distal prestenotic duodenum; acute angle cutoff of 40.7° between the prestenotic and poststenotic duodenum; the "S" shape formed by the pylorus, the duodenal bulb, and the prestenotic and poststenotic descending duodenum. • The acute angle with the highest diagnostic value can be used to quantitatively diagnose neonatal annular pancreas and avoid potential misdiagnosis caused by sonographers' subjectivity.

Indexed as

Diagnosis, DifferentialDuodenal ObstructionDuodenumFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMalePancreasPancreatic DiseasesRetrospective StudiesROC CurveUltrasonographyDuodenumNeonatePancreasUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID30617479
OpenAlexW2910235563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.