ArticleBioprocess and biosystems engineering2019
A heuristic approach to handling missing data in biologics manufacturing databases.
Article in Bioprocess and biosystems engineering, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Data-Driven Approach for Bioreactor Monitoring and Prediction in Monoclonal Antibody Production.ACS omega · 2026Article
- A Machine Learning Platform for Imputing Missing Critical Quality Attributes in Pharmaceutical Development.The AAPS journal · 2026Article
- Parent-to-child intergenerational influence of perceived alienation towards parents: mediation of children's life-events, and moderation of children's gender and left-behind status.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- Quantitative Assessment of Biological Dynamics with Aggregate Data.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2025Article
- To Impute or Not To Impute in Untargeted Metabolomics─That is the Compositional Question.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with synchronous liver metastases: a study based on the SEER database and an external cohort.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Metaheuristic approaches in biopharmaceutical process development data analysis.Bioprocess and biosystems engineering · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The biologics sector has amassed a wealth of data in the past three decades, in line with the bioprocess development and manufacturing guidelines, and analysis of these data with precision is expected to reveal behavioural patterns in cell populations that can be used for making predictions on how future culture processes might behave. The historical bioprocessing data likely comprise experiments conducted using different cell lines, to produce different products and may be years apart; the situation causing inter-batch variability and missing data points to human- and instrument-associated technical oversights. These unavoidable complications necessitate the introduction of a pre-processing step prior to data mining. This study investigated the efficiency of mean imputation and multivariate regression for filling in the missing information in historical bio-manufacturing datasets, and evaluated their performance by symbolic regression models and Bayesian non-parametric models in subsequent data processing. Mean substitution was shown to be a simple and efficient imputation method for relatively smooth, non-dynamical datasets, and regression imputation was effective whilst maintaining the existing standard deviation and shape of the distribution in dynamical datasets with less than 30% missing data. The nature of the missing information, whether Missing Completely At Random, Missing At Random or Missing Not At Random, emerged as the key feature for selecting the imputation method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.