Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30617210›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2019

Nonlinear Processing of Shape Information in Rat Lateral Extrastriate Cortex.

Giulio Matteucci, Rosilari Bellacosa Marotti, Margherita Riggi, Federica B Rosselli, Davide Zoccolan

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Associations betweenbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  13. Mapping the Function of Whole-Brain Projection at the Single Neuron Level.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Giulio MatteucciVisual Neuroscience Laboratory, International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA), Trieste 34136, Italy, and.ORCID 0000-0003-1165-9671
Rosilari Bellacosa MarottiVisual Neuroscience Laboratory, International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA), Trieste 34136, Italy, and.
Margherita RiggiVisual Neuroscience Laboratory, International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA), Trieste 34136, Italy, and.
Federica B RosselliVisual Neuroscience Laboratory, International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA), Trieste 34136, Italy, and zoccolan@sissa.it federica.rosselli@caesar.de.ORCID 0000-0002-8233-0550
Davide ZoccolanVisual Neuroscience Laboratory, International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA), Trieste 34136, Italy, and zoccolan@sissa.it federica.rosselli@caesar.de.ORCID 0000-0001-7221-4188
Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati · ITCenter of Advanced European Studies and Research · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In rodents, the progression of extrastriate areas located laterally to primary visual cortex (V1) has been assigned to a putative object-processing pathway (homologous to the primate ventral stream), based on anatomical considerations. Recently, we found functional support for such attribution (Tafazoli et al., 2017), by showing that this cortical progression is specialized for coding object identity despite view changes, the hallmark property of a ventral-like pathway. Here, we sought to clarify what computations are at the base of such specialization. To this aim, we performed multielectrode recordings from V1 and laterolateral area LL (at the apex of the putative ventral-like hierarchy) of male adult rats, during the presentation of drifting gratings and noise movies. We found that the extent to which neuronal responses were entrained to the phase of the gratings sharply dropped from V1 to LL, along with the quality of the receptive fields inferred through reverse correlation. Concomitantly, the tendency of neurons to respond to different oriented gratings increased, whereas the sharpness of orientation tuning declined. Critically, these trends are consistent with the nonlinear summation of visual inputs that is expected to take place along the ventral stream, according to the predictions of hierarchical models of ventral computations and a meta-analysis of the monkey literature. This suggests an intriguing homology between the mechanisms responsible for building up shape selectivity and transformation tolerance in the visual cortex of primates and rodents, reasserting the potential of the latter as models to investigate ventral stream functions at the circuitry level.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalPattern Recognition, VisualAnimalsMaleRatsRats, Long-EvansVisual CortexVisual Fieldsgratingorientation tuningphase sensitivityreverse correlationrodentventral stream

Identifiers

PMID30617210
PMCPMC6391565
OpenAlexW2951643009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.