Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30617208›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2019

Beta and Theta Oscillations Differentially Support Free Versus Forced Control over Multiple-Target Search.

Joram van Driel, Eduard Ort, Johannes J Fahrenfort, Christian N L Olivers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Decoding Object-Based Auditory Attention from Source-Reconstructed MEG Alpha Oscillations.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joram van DrielDepartment of Experimental and Applied Psychology, Institute for Brain and Behavior, Faculty of Behavioral and Movement Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands, and.ORCID 0000-0002-6950-2901
Eduard OrtDepartment of Experimental and Applied Psychology, Institute for Brain and Behavior, Faculty of Behavioral and Movement Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands, and.ORCID 0000-0001-5546-3561
Johannes J FahrenfortDepartment of Experimental and Applied Psychology, Institute for Brain and Behavior, Faculty of Behavioral and Movement Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands, and.ORCID 0000-0002-9025-3436
Christian N L OliversDepartment of Experimental and Applied Psychology, Institute for Brain and Behavior, Faculty of Behavioral and Movement Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands, and c.n.l.olivers@vu.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-7470-5378

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many important situations require human observers to simultaneously search for more than one object. Despite a long history of research into visual search, the behavioral and neural mechanisms associated with multiple-target search are poorly understood. Here we test the novel theory that the efficiency of looking for multiple targets critically depends on the mode of cognitive control the environment affords to the observer. We used an innovative combination of electroencephalogram (EEG) and eye tracking while participants searched for two targets, within two different contexts: either both targets were present in the search display and observers were free to prioritize either one of them, thus enabling proactive control over selection; or only one of the two targets would be present in each search display, which requires reactive control to reconfigure selection when the wrong target has been prioritized. During proactive control, both univariate and multivariate signals of beta-band (15-35 Hz) power suppression before display onset predicted switches between target selections. This signal originated over midfrontal and sensorimotor regions and has previously been associated with endogenous state changes. In contrast, imposed target selections requiring reactive control elicited prefrontal power enhancements in the delta/theta band (2-8 Hz), but only after display onset. This signal predicted individual differences in associated oculomotor switch costs, reflecting reactive reconfiguration of target selection. The results provide compelling evidence that multiple target representations are differentially prioritized during visual search, and for the first time reveal distinct neural mechanisms underlying proactive and reactive control over multiple-target search.

Indexed as

Beta RhythmPattern Recognition, VisualTheta RhythmAdultAttentionFemaleFrontal LobeHumansMalebeta bandcognitive controlmedial frontal cortexpriority statestheta bandvisual search

Identifiers

PMID30617208
PMCPMC6391569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.