Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30617099›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Burden of heart failure in Flemish general practices: a registry-based study in the Intego database.

Miek Smeets, Bert Vaes, Pavlos Mamouris, Marjan Van Den Akker, Gijs Van Pottelbergh, Geert Goderis, Stefan Janssens, Bert Aertgeerts, Séverine Henrard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Data resource profile: the Intego-II primary care database.International journal of epidemiology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Global epidemiology of heart failure.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Clinical markers in heart failure: a narrative review.The Journal of international medical research · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. New onset heart failure with reduced ejection fraction management: single center, real-life Tunisian experience.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  18. Observational
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Miek SmeetsDepartement of Public Health and Primary Care, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-7725-4429
Bert VaesDepartement of Public Health and Primary Care, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Pavlos MamourisDepartement of Public Health and Primary Care, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Marjan Van Den AkkerDepartement of Public Health and Primary Care, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Gijs Van PottelberghDepartement of Public Health and Primary Care, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Geert GoderisDepartement of Public Health and Primary Care, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Stefan JanssensDepartement of Cardiovascular Diseases, Universitair Ziekenhuis Gasthuisberg, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Bert AertgeertsDepartement of Public Health and Primary Care, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Séverine HenrardDepartement of Public Health and Primary Care, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the prevalence and incidence of heart failure (HF) stages A to C/D and their evolution over a 16-year period. Additionally, trends in comorbidities and cardiovascular (CV) treatment in patients with HF were studied in the same period.

designRegistry-based study.

settingPrimary care, Flanders, Belgium.

participantsData were obtained from Intego, a morbidity registration network in which 111 general practitioners of 48 practices collaborate. In the study period between 2000 and 2015, data from 165 796 unique patients aged 45 years and older were available. OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence and incidence were calculated for HF stage A, B and C/D by gender. Additionally, the trend in age-standardised prevalence and incidence rates between 2000 and 2015 was analysed with joint-point regression. The same model was used to study trends in comorbidity profiles in incident HF cases and trends in cardiovascular medication in prevalent HF cases.

resultsWe found a downward trend in the incidence and prevalence of HF stage C/D in Flemish general practice between 2000 and 2015, whereas the prevalence and incidence of stage A and B increased. The burden of comorbidities in incident HF cases increased during the study period, as shown by an increasing disease count (p<0.001). The prescription of cardiovascular medication such as renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade, β-blockers and statins showed a sharp increase in the first part of the study period (2000-2008).

conclusionAge-standardised incidence and prevalence of HF stage C/D showed a slightly downward trend over the past 16 years, probably due to the sharp increase in cardiovascular treatment. However, the increasing age-standardised incidence and prevalence of stage A and B, as precursors of symptomatic HF, together with a rising comorbid burden, highlights the challenges we are still facing.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsBelgiumCardiovascular AgentsComorbidityCost of IllnessDatabases, FactualFemaleGeneral PracticeHeart FailureHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceCardiovascular Agentsepidemiologyheart failurepublic health

Identifiers

PMID30617099
PMCPMC6326340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.