Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30617046›Full record

ArticleJMIR mental health2019

Internet-Based Interventions for Problem Gambling: Scoping Review.

Mark van der Maas, Jing Shi, Tara Elton-Marshall, David C Hodgins, Sherald Sanchez, Daniela Ss Lobo, Sylvia Hagopian, Nigel E Turner

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mental health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
11.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mark van der Maas *Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9606-0187
Jing ShiInstitute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7156-8128
Tara Elton-MarshallInstitute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1674-8588
David C HodginsDepartment of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2737-5200
Sherald SanchezInstitute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5558-1007
Daniela Ss LoboCampbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4160-6917
Sylvia HagopianProblem Gambling Institute of Ontario, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4868-067X
Nigel E TurnerInstitute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1035-2064
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health · CAUniversity of Calgary · CAWestern University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study seeks to give an overview of academic research on internet-based interventions that are used to address problem gambling. The rate of treatment seeking has been demonstrated to be low across several research environments. This is in part because of the systemic barriers that treatment seekers face to accessing traditional face-to-face treatment. Making treatment resources for problem gambling available through the internet is one way to reduce the impact of those systemic barriers. The use of internet-based resources to address problem gambling has been growing, and a field of research evaluating it has developed as well. However, little has been done to summarize this collection of research.

objectiveThis study aimed to provide a scoping review of the use of internet-based interventions for problem gambling treatment and prevention to provide an understanding of the current state of the field.

methodsA scoping review was performed for 6 peer-reviewed research databases (Web of Science, PsycINFO, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, MEDLINE, Social Science Abstracts, and Scopus) and 3 gray literature databases (MedEdPortal, Proquest: Dissertations, and OpenGrey). Article inclusion criteria were as follows: published over the 10-year period of 2007 to 2017, including an intervention for problem gambling, and involving the use of internet to deliver that intervention.

resultsA total of 27 articles were found that met the review criteria. Studies were found from several different areas, with particularly strong representation for Australia, New Zealand, and Scandinavia. Cognitive behavioral therapy was the most common form of internet-based intervention. Internet-based interventions were generally shown to be effective in reducing problem gambling scores and gambling behaviors. A wide range of interventions that made use of internet resources included text-based interactions with counselors and peers, automated personalized and normative feedback on gambling behaviors, and interactive cognitive behavioral therapies. A lack of diversity in samples, little comparison with face-to-face interventions, and issues of changes in the treatment dynamic are identified as areas that require further investigation.

conclusionsInternet-based interventions are a promising direction for treatment and prevention of problem gambling, particularly in reducing barriers to accessing professional help. The state of the current literature is sparse, and more research is needed for directly comparing internet-based interventions and their traditional counterparts.

Indexed as

interventionproblem gamblingtreatment

Identifiers

PMID30617046
PMCPMC6329421
OpenAlexW2895868356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.