Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30616815›Full record

ArticleMethods in cell biology2019

Measuring surface expression and endocytosis of GPCRs using whole-cell ELISA.

Shubhi Pandey, Debarati Roy, Arun K Shukla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in cell biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Discovery of a functionally selective ghrelin receptor (GHSRProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shubhi PandeyDepartment of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, India.
Debarati RoyDepartment of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, India.
Arun K ShuklaDepartment of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, India. Electronic address: arshukla@iitk.ac.in.

Funding

DBT-Wellcome Trust India Alliance IA/I/14/1/501285Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) constitute a large class of cell surface receptors that recognize a wide array of ligands and mediate a diverse spectrum of signaling pathways. Measuring their surface expression in cellular context is a critical aspect of studying their signaling pathways and cellular outcomes. Upon addition of agonist, GPCRs typically undergo internalization and traffic from the plasma membrane to endosomal compartments. Although radioligand binding has been the primary assay to measure GPCR surface expression and internalization, whole-cell ELISA has now emerged as a powerful alternative approach. Here, we present a step-by-step whole-cell ELISA protocol for measuring relative surface expression and agonist-induced internalization of GPCRs containing engineered N-terminal epitope tag and recombinantly expressed in heterologous cells.

Indexed as

EndocytosisCell MembraneEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayHEK293 CellsHumansReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledBiased agonismELISAEndocytosisGPCRsSignalingTraffickingβ-Arrestins

Identifiers

PMID30616815
PMCPMC7115871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.