Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30616716›Full record

ArticleeLife2019

Predicting mutational routes to new adaptive phenotypes.

Peter A Lind, Eric Libby, Jenny Herzog, Paul B Rainey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Integrating pH into the metabolic theory of ecology to predict bacterial diversity in soil.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Genetic diversification ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Extending evolutionary forecasts across bacterial species.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  15. Advantage of an epigenetic switch in response to alternate environments.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Mutation bias and adaptation in bacteria.Microbiology (Reading, England) · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Peter A LindNew Zealand Institute for Advanced Study, Massey University at Albany, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-1510-8324
Eric LibbyNew Zealand Institute for Advanced Study, Massey University at Albany, Auckland, New Zealand.
Jenny HerzogNew Zealand Institute for Advanced Study, Massey University at Albany, Auckland, New Zealand.
Paul B RaineyNew Zealand Institute for Advanced Study, Massey University at Albany, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-0879-5795

Funding

Royal Society of New Zealand Marsden Fund Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predicting evolutionary change poses numerous challenges. Here we take advantage of the model bacterium

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalBiasGenotypeModels, BiologicalMutationMutation RatePhenotypePseudomonas fluorescensc-di-GMPevolutionary biologyevolutionary forecastingexperimental evolutiongenetic architecturegeneticsgenomicsPseudomonas fluorescenswrinkly spreader

Identifiers

PMID30616716
PMCPMC6324874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.