Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30616666›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2019

Combination of microbiome analysis and serodiagnostics to assess the risk of pathogen transmission by ticks to humans and animals in central Germany.

Yvonne Regier, Kassandra Komma, Markus Weigel, Peter Kraiczy, Arttu Laisi, Arto T Pulliainen, Torsten Hain, Volkhard A J Kempf

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Microbiology spectrum · 2023
    Article
  10. Evidence forPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  11. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Antibodies Related toPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  19. Microorganisms · 2020
    Review
  20. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yvonne RegierUniversity Hospital, Goethe-University, Institute for Medical Microbiology and Infection Control, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Kassandra KommaInstitute of Medical Microbiology, Justus-Liebig University, Giessen, Germany.
Markus WeigelInstitute of Medical Microbiology, Justus-Liebig University, Giessen, Germany.
Peter KraiczyUniversity Hospital, Goethe-University, Institute for Medical Microbiology and Infection Control, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Arttu LaisiInstitute of Biomedicine, Research Center for Cancer, Infections and Immunity, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Arto T PulliainenInstitute of Biomedicine, Research Center for Cancer, Infections and Immunity, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Torsten HainInstitute of Medical Microbiology, Justus-Liebig University, Giessen, Germany. Torsten.Hain@mikrobio.med.uni-giessen.de.
Volkhard A J KempfUniversity Hospital, Goethe-University, Institute for Medical Microbiology and Infection Control, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. volkhard.kempf@kgu.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3321-7551
Goethe University Frankfurt · DEJustus-Liebig-Universität Gießen · DEUniversity of Turku · FI

Funding

Academy of Finland 295296, 2016-2020BMBF CAPSyS 01ZX16004CDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SFB-TR84 TRR 84/2 2014Deutsches Zentrum für Infektionsforschung NoneForschungsgemeinschaft SFB-TR84 project B08 (TRR 84/3 2018)Robert Koch Institut, Berlin 1369-354Sigrid Juséliuksen Säätiö Junior group leader grant, 2015-2018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundArthropod-borne diseases remain a major health-threat for humans and animals worldwide. To estimate the distribution of pathogenic agents and especially Bartonella spp., we conducted tick microbiome analysis and determination of the infection status of wild animals, pets and pet owners in the state of Hesse, Germany.

resultsIn total, 189 engorged ticks collected from 163 animals were tested. Selected ticks were analyzed by next generation sequencing (NGS) and confirmatory PCRs, blood specimens of 48 wild animals were analyzed by PCR to confirm pathogen presence and sera of 54 dogs, one cat and 11 dog owners were analyzed by serology. Bartonella spp. were detected in 9.5% of all ticks and in the blood of 17 roe deer. Further data reveal the presence of the human and animal pathogenic species of genera in the family Spirochaetaceae (including Borrelia miyamotoi and Borrelia garinii), Bartonella spp. (mainly Bartonella schoenbuchensis), Rickettsia helvetica, Francisella tularensis and Anaplasma phagocytophilum in ticks. Co-infections with species of several genera were detected in nine ticks. One dog and five dog owners were seropositive for anti-Bartonella henselae-antibodies and one dog had antibodies against Rickettsia conorii.

conclusionsThis study provides a snapshot of pathogens circulating in ticks in central Germany. A broad range of tick-borne pathogens are present in ticks, and especially in wild animals, with possible implications for animal and human health. However, a low incidence of Bartonella spp., especially Bartonella henselae, was detected. The high number of various detected pathogens suggests that ticks might serve as an excellent sentinel to detect and monitor zoonotic human pathogens.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaAnimalsCat DiseasesCatsDeerDog DiseasesDogsFemaleGermanyGram-Negative BacteriaGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsHumansMalePetsRiskSequence AlignmentBartonellaDogIlluminaMicrobiomeNanoporeOne healthRoe deerTick

Identifiers

PMID30616666
PMCPMC6322329
OpenAlexW2936259650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.