Observational studyBMC medical education2019
Effects of gender in resident evaluations and certifying examination pass rates.
Observational study in BMC medical education, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Differential attainment within medical education: a systematic review.BMC medical education · 2025Pooled it
- Impact of faculty and resident gender on milestone evaluations in anesthesiology residency: a retrospective analysis.Medical education online · 2026Article
- Behavioral Profiles in Romanian Resident Physicians: An Exploratory Study with Implications for Medical Education and Human Resource Development.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Does gender influence learning, perceptions and retention in regional anatomy dissection courses?Anatomical science international · 2026Article
- Examining Gender-Based Differences in Quantitative Ratings and Narrative Comments in Faculty Assessments by Residents and Fellows.Journal of graduate medical education · 2025Article
- Resident factors associated with American board of internal medicine certification exam failure.Medical education online · 2023Article
- COVID-19 and Access to Medical Professional Careers: Does Gender Matter?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Assessment of Implicit Gender Bias During Evaluation of Procedural Competency Among Emergency Medicine Residents.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- Article
- Association Between Internal Medicine Residency Applicant Characteristics and Performance on ACGME Milestones During Intern Year.Journal of graduate medical education · 2021Article
- Association of Gender With Learner Assessment in Graduate Medical Education.JAMA network open · 2020Article
- Let's Face It: We Are Biased, and It Should Not Be That Way.Journal of general internal medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThough the proportion of female Internal Medicine (IM) residents and faculty has increased, there is minimal large scale modern data comparing resident performance by gender. This study sought to examine the effects of resident and faculty gender on resident evaluations.
methodsRetrospective observational study over 5 years in a single IM program. IM certifying examination pass rates were obtained from the American Board of IM.
resultsFour hundred eighty-eight residents (195 women, 293 men), evaluated by 430 attending physicians (163 women, 270 men) were included. Twelve thousand six hundred eighty-one evaluations between 2007 and 2012 were analyzed. Female residents scored higher in two domains (Medical Interviewing, and Interpersonal and Communication Skills) (p < 0.01 for each), with no significant difference between genders for the other domains (Medical Knowledge, Overall Patient Care, Physical Examination, Procedural Skills, Professionalism, Practice Based Learning and Improvement, System Based Practices and Overall score). There were no differences in scoring between female and male attending physicians. There were no differences in certifying examination scores between women and men among graduating residents. National pass rates for women were not statistically different to pass rates for men from 1987 to 2015.
conclusionsData from one large academic medical center demonstrate higher ratings for female residents on performance domains reflecting bedside care and interpersonal skills, with similar scores for medical knowledge and remaining domains. No significant difference was seen locally in certifying examination scores, nor in recent national pass rates, an objective measure of medical knowledge. Despite imbalanced female representation in areas of medicine, our data suggest that gender-based disparities in Internal Medicine resident medical knowledge and physician competency are no longer present.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.