Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30616651›Full record

Observational studyBMC medical education2019

Effects of gender in resident evaluations and certifying examination pass rates.

Melanie S Sulistio, Amit Khera, Kathryn Squiers, Monika Sanghavi, Colby R Ayers, Weifeng Weng, Salahuddin Kazi, James de Lemos, David H Johnson, Lynne Kirk

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC medical education, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. COVID-19 and Access to Medical Professional Careers: Does Gender Matter?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Let's Face It: We Are Biased, and It Should Not Be That Way.Journal of general internal medicine · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Melanie S SulistioDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX, 75390-8830, USA. Melanie.Sulistio@UTSouthwestern.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4034-1523
Amit KheraDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX, 75390-8830, USA.
Kathryn SquiersUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Monika SanghaviDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX, 75390-8830, USA.
Colby R AyersDivision of Cardiology, Dallas, USA.
Weifeng WengAmerican Board of Internal Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Salahuddin KaziDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX, 75390-8830, USA.
James de LemosDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX, 75390-8830, USA.
David H JohnsonDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX, 75390-8830, USA.
Lynne KirkDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX, 75390-8830, USA.
Infinity Vision Dallas · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USAmerican Board of Internal Medicine · USSouthwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThough the proportion of female Internal Medicine (IM) residents and faculty has increased, there is minimal large scale modern data comparing resident performance by gender. This study sought to examine the effects of resident and faculty gender on resident evaluations.

methodsRetrospective observational study over 5 years in a single IM program. IM certifying examination pass rates were obtained from the American Board of IM.

resultsFour hundred eighty-eight residents (195 women, 293 men), evaluated by 430 attending physicians (163 women, 270 men) were included. Twelve thousand six hundred eighty-one evaluations between 2007 and 2012 were analyzed. Female residents scored higher in two domains (Medical Interviewing, and Interpersonal and Communication Skills) (p < 0.01 for each), with no significant difference between genders for the other domains (Medical Knowledge, Overall Patient Care, Physical Examination, Procedural Skills, Professionalism, Practice Based Learning and Improvement, System Based Practices and Overall score). There were no differences in scoring between female and male attending physicians. There were no differences in certifying examination scores between women and men among graduating residents. National pass rates for women were not statistically different to pass rates for men from 1987 to 2015.

conclusionsData from one large academic medical center demonstrate higher ratings for female residents on performance domains reflecting bedside care and interpersonal skills, with similar scores for medical knowledge and remaining domains. No significant difference was seen locally in certifying examination scores, nor in recent national pass rates, an objective measure of medical knowledge. Despite imbalanced female representation in areas of medicine, our data suggest that gender-based disparities in Internal Medicine resident medical knowledge and physician competency are no longer present.

Indexed as

CertificationClinical CompetenceInternship and ResidencyClinical MedicineFemaleHumansInternal MedicineMaleRetrospective StudiesSpecialty BoardsCertification examGenderMedical educationResident evaluations

Identifiers

PMID30616651
PMCPMC6322320
OpenAlexW2912396747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.