Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30616591›Full record

SynthesisBMC veterinary research2019

Critically appraised topic for the most effective and safe treatment for canine generalised demodicosis.

Roberta Perego, Eva Spada, Caterina Foppa, Daniela Proverbio

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC veterinary research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A new species ofInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2024
    Article
  2. Open veterinary journal · 2023
    Article
  3. Canine and feline P-glycoprotein deficiency: What we know and where we need to go.Journal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Roberta PeregoDepartment of Veterinary Medicine (DIMEVET), University of Milan, Via G. Celoria 10, 20133, Milan, Italy. roberta.perego@unimi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8241-907X
Eva SpadaDepartment of Veterinary Medicine (DIMEVET), University of Milan, Via G. Celoria 10, 20133, Milan, Italy.
Caterina FoppaDepartment of Veterinary Medicine (DIMEVET), University of Milan, Via G. Celoria 10, 20133, Milan, Italy.
Daniela ProverbioDepartment of Veterinary Medicine (DIMEVET), University of Milan, Via G. Celoria 10, 20133, Milan, Italy.
University of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCanine generalised demodicosis is an inflammatory parasitic skin disease caused by an excessive proliferation of Demodex spp. Generalized demodicosis is a severe skin disease, that can be life threatening if not treated properly. Many of the current treatment options are not licensed for the treatment of generalised demodicosis, it have a low safety margin and may be poorly efficacious and time-consuming for the owner; there is a need for a safe, efficacious treatment for canine demodicosis. Our objective was to systematically review the literature to determine the most effective and safe topical or systemic therapy for canine generalised demodicosis. Single case reports and case series with fewer than five patients were not reviewed as they were considered to be poor quality evidence. A detailed literature search identified 21 relevant clinical trials and these were critically assessed.

resultsThe analysis of the best available evidence on March 5, 2018, suggests that six are the most effective and safe treatments for generalised canine demodicosis including (in alphabetical order): doramectin (oral or parenteral); fluralaner (oral); imidacloprid/moxidectin (topical); ivermectin (oral, not as first choice treatment); milbemycin oxime (oral); and sarolaner (oral). There was insufficient evidence to allow comment on the appropriateness of other treatment protocols for canine generalised demodicosis in this CAT.

conclusionsIn our critical appraisal of the best scientific literature, there is evidence for recommending the use of 6 therapeutic options against demodectic mange. Further, in vivo, controlled, randomized and blinded clinical trials are required, to evaluate new therapies.

Indexed as

AcaricidesAnimalsAzetidinesDog DiseasesDogsIsoxazolesIvermectinMacrolidesMite InfestationsMitesSpiro CompoundsA1443 compoundAcaricidesAzetidinesdoramectinIsoxazolesIvermectinMacrolidesmilbemycin oximesarolanerSpiro CompoundsCanine generalised demodicosisDemodectic mangeEfficacySystemic therapyTherapeutic protocolTopical therapyTreatment

Identifiers

PMID30616591
PMCPMC6323682
OpenAlexW2915974159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.