Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30616584›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2019

A clinical text classification paradigm using weak supervision and deep representation.

Yanshan Wang, Sunghwan Sohn, Sijia Liu, Feichen Shen, Liwei Wang, Elizabeth J Atkinson, Shreyasee Amin, Hongfang Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
26.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 413 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. On the development and validation of large language model-based classifiers for identifying social determinants of health.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yanshan WangDivision of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st ST SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. wang.yanshan@mayo.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4433-7839
Sunghwan SohnDivision of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st ST SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Sijia LiuDivision of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st ST SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Feichen ShenDivision of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st ST SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Liwei WangDivision of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st ST SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Elizabeth J AtkinsonDivision of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st ST SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Shreyasee AminDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st ST SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Hongfang LiuDivision of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st ST SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. liu.hongfang@mayo.edu.
Mayo Clinic in Florida · USMayo Clinic · US

Funding

SEX STEROIDS, GROWTH FACTORS, &BONE CELL FUNCTIONP01AG004875 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KHOSLA, SUNDEEP · 1985 to 2019
$30.8M
Rochester Epidemiology ProjectR01AG034676 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI ROCCA, WALTER A, ST SAUVER, JENNIFER LYNN · 2010 to 2019
$9.5M
Open Health Natural Language Processing CollaboratoryU01TR002062 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI JIANG, XIAOQIAN, LIU, HONGFANG · 2017 to 2021
$7.6M
Semi-structured Information Retrieval in Clinical Text for Cohort IdentificationR01LM011934 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI HERSH, WILLIAM R, LIU, HONGFANG · 2014 to 2025
$5.1M
Secondary use of EMRs for surgical complication surveillanceR01EB019403 · NIBIB · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI LIU, HONGFANG, STORLIE, CURTIS · 2015 to 2022
$3.8M
Multiple Chronic Conditions and AgingR01AG052425 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI ROCCA, WALTER A, ST SAUVER, JENNIFER LYNN · 2017 to 2021
$3.3M
Natural language processing for clinical and translational researchR01GM102282 · NIGMS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI LIU, HONGFANG, PAKHOMOV, SERGUEI VS · 2013 to 2016
$2.5M
NCATS NIH HHS U01 TR002062NIA NIH HHS P01 AG004875NIA NIH HHS R01 AG034676NIA NIH HHS R01 AG052425NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB019403NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM102282NLM NIH HHS R01 LM011934
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAutomatic clinical text classification is a natural language processing (NLP) technology that unlocks information embedded in clinical narratives. Machine learning approaches have been shown to be effective for clinical text classification tasks. However, a successful machine learning model usually requires extensive human efforts to create labeled training data and conduct feature engineering. In this study, we propose a clinical text classification paradigm using weak supervision and deep representation to reduce these human efforts.

methodsWe develop a rule-based NLP algorithm to automatically generate labels for the training data, and then use the pre-trained word embeddings as deep representation features for training machine learning models. Since machine learning is trained on labels generated by the automatic NLP algorithm, this training process is called weak supervision. We evaluat the paradigm effectiveness on two institutional case studies at Mayo Clinic: smoking status classification and proximal femur (hip) fracture classification, and one case study using a public dataset: the i2b2 2006 smoking status classification shared task. We test four widely used machine learning models, namely, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), Multilayer Perceptron Neural Networks (MLPNN), and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), using this paradigm. Precision, recall, and F1 score are used as metrics to evaluate performance.

resultsCNN achieves the best performance in both institutional tasks (F1 score: 0.92 for Mayo Clinic smoking status classification and 0.97 for fracture classification). We show that word embeddings significantly outperform tf-idf and topic modeling features in the paradigm, and that CNN captures additional patterns from the weak supervision compared to the rule-based NLP algorithms. We also observe two drawbacks of the proposed paradigm that CNN is more sensitive to the size of training data, and that the proposed paradigm might not be effective for complex multiclass classification tasks.

conclusionThe proposed clinical text classification paradigm could reduce human efforts of labeled training data creation and feature engineering for applying machine learning to clinical text classification by leveraging weak supervision and deep representation. The experimental experiments have validated the effectiveness of paradigm by two institutional and one shared clinical text classification tasks.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsElectronic Health RecordsMachine LearningNatural Language ProcessingNeural Networks, ComputerDatasets as TopicHip FracturesHumansSmokingClinical text classificationElectronic health recordsMachine learningNatural language processingWeak supervision

Identifiers

PMID30616584
PMCPMC6322223
OpenAlexW2927032858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.