Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30616391›Full record

ReviewDevelopmental neuropsychology

Beyond the Bayley: Neurocognitive Assessments of Development During Infancy and Toddlerhood.

Natalie H Brito, William P Fifer, Dima Amso, Rachel Barr, Martha Ann Bell, Susan Calkins, Albert Flynn, Hawley E Montgomery-Downs, Lisa M Oakes, John E Richards and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Developmental neuropsychology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Natalie H Britoa Department of Applied Psychology , New York University , New York , NY , USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1016-0094
William P Fiferb Division of Developmental Neuroscience , New York State Psychiatric Institute , New York , NY , USA.
Dima Amsoc Department of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Sciences , Brown University , Providence , RI , USA.
Rachel Barrd Department of Psychology , Georgetown University , Washington , DC , USA.
Martha Ann Belle Department of Psychology , Virginia Tech , Blacksburg , VA , USA.
Susan Calkinsf Department of Human Development and Family Studies , University of North Carolina at Greensboro , Greensboro , NC , USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7680-8266
Albert Flynng School of Food and Nutritional Sciences , University College Cork , Cork , Ireland.
Hawley E Montgomery-Downsh Department of Psychology , West Virginia University , Morgantown , WV , USA.
Lisa M Oakesi Department of Psychology , University of California , Davis , CA , USA.
John E Richardsj Department of Psychology , University of South Carolina , Columbia , SC , USA.
Larissa M Samuelsonk Department of Psychology , University of East Anglia , Norfolk , UK.
John Colombol Department of Psychology , University of Kansas , Lawrence , KS , USA.

Funding

Contributions of SES and Bilingualism on Early Cognitive DevelopmentR00HD086255 · NICHD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI BRITO, NATALIE HIROMI · 2017 to 2019
$730k
Examining the independent and joint contributions of socioeconomic status and bilingualism on early cognitive developmentK99HD086255 · NICHD · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI BRITO, NATALIE HIROMI · 2016 to 2017
$164k
NICHD NIH HHS K99 HD086255NICHD NIH HHS R00 HD086255
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of global, standardized instruments is conventional among clinicians and researchers interested in assessing neurocognitive development. Exclusively relying on these tests for evaluating effects may underestimate or miss specific effects on early cognition. The goal of this review is to identify alternative measures for possible inclusion in future clinical trials and interventions evaluating early neurocognitive development. The domains included for consideration are attention, memory, executive function, language, and socioemotional development. Although domain-based tests are limited, as psychometric properties have not yet been well-established, this review includes tasks and paradigms that have been reliably used across various developmental psychology laboratories.

Indexed as

Child, PreschoolFemaleGrowth and DevelopmentHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleNeuropsychological Tests

Identifiers

PMID30616391
PMCPMC6399032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.