Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30616384›Full record

ReviewExperimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.)2019

Uncovering the hidden microbiota in hospital and built environments: New approaches and solutions.

Ana P Christoff, Aline Fr Sereia, Camila Hernandes, Luiz Fv de Oliveira

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Resistome in the indoor dust samples from workplaces and households: a pilot study.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ana P Christoff1 Neoprospecta Microbiome Technologies, CEP 88057-260, SC - Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-0264-6177
Aline Fr Sereia1 Neoprospecta Microbiome Technologies, CEP 88057-260, SC - Brasil.
Camila Hernandes2 Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, CEP 05651-901, SP - Brasil.
Luiz Fv de Oliveira1 Neoprospecta Microbiome Technologies, CEP 88057-260, SC - Brasil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

impact statementResearch concerning the microbiome of indoor environments like hospitals, houses or buildings could have several implications for human health. Today, there is an ongoing shift in the paradigm of microbial analysis, from single isolated bacterial samples to entire microbiome profiles using high-throughput DNA sequencing methods. The use of sequencing methods in several studies has revealed an unprecedented microbial diversity in indoor environments, leading to a larger comprehension of the entire microbiome context. Here, we present a review of these microbiome studies using high-throughput DNA sequencing, including some new approaches and ideas that can be broadly applied in microbial tracking and epidemiological surveillance of indoor environments.

Indexed as

Built EnvironmentEnvironmental MicrobiologyHospitalsMicrobiological TechniquesEnvironmental MonitoringHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansbacteriabuilt environmenthigh-throughput DNA sequencinghospitalMicrobiome

Identifiers

PMID30616384
PMCPMC6547007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.