Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30616238›Full record

SynthesisCerebrovascular diseases extra2019

Health Economic Evaluations of Digital Health Interventions for Secondary Prevention in Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review.

Alexis Valenzuela Espinoza, Stephane Steurbaut, Alain Dupont, Pieter Cornu, Robbert-Jan van Hooff, Raf Brouns, Koen Putman

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cerebrovascular diseases extra, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Alexis Valenzuela EspinozaVrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Interuniversity Center for Health Economics Research (I-CHER), Brussels, Belgium, alexis.valenzuela.espinoza@vub.be.
Stephane SteurbautVrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Research Group Clinical Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy (KFAR), Brussels, Belgium.
Alain DupontVrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Research Group Clinical Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy (KFAR), Brussels, Belgium.
Pieter CornuVrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Research Group Clinical Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy (KFAR), Brussels, Belgium.
Robbert-Jan van HooffVrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Brussels, Belgium.
Raf BrounsVrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Brussels, Belgium.
Koen PutmanVrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Interuniversity Center for Health Economics Research (I-CHER), Brussels, Belgium.
Vrije Universiteit Brussel · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the first 5 years after their stroke, about a quarter of patients will suffer from a recurrent stroke. Digital health interventions facilitating interactions between a caregiver and a patient from a distance are a promising approach to improve patient adherence to lifestyle changes proposed by secondary prevention guidelines. Many of these interventions are not implemented in daily practice, even though efficacy has been shown. One of the reasons can be the lack of clear economic incentives for implementation. We propose to map all health economic evidence regarding digital health interventions for secondary stroke prevention. SUMMARY: We performed a systematic search according to PRISMA-P guidelines and searched on PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, and National Institute for Health Research Economic Evaluation Database. Only digital health interventions for secondary prevention in stroke patients were included and all study designs and health economic outcomes were accepted. We combined the terms "Stroke OR Cardiovascular," "Secondary prevention," "Digital health interventions," and "Cost" in one search string using the AND operator. The search performed on April 20, 2017 yielded 163 records of which 26 duplicates were removed. After abstract screening, 20 articles were retained for full-text analysis, of which none reported any health economic evidence that could be included for analysis or discussion. Key Messages: There is a lack of evidence on health economic outcomes on digital health interventions for secondary stroke prevention. Future research in this area should take health economics into consideration when designing a trial and there is a clear need for health economic evidence and models.

Indexed as

Health Care CostsCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansRecurrenceSecondary PreventionStrokeTelemedicineTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeDigital health interventionsHealth economics of strokeSecondary preventionStrokeTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID30616238
PMCPMC6489060
OpenAlexW2909031265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.