Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30616234›Full record

ArticleBiofabrication2019

Bioprinting of 3D breast epithelial spheroids for human cancer models.

Swathi Swaminathan, Qudus Hamid, Wei Sun, Alisa Morss Clyne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biofabrication, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. 3D bioprinting innovations: a new frontier in breast cancer research.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. BIOPRINTING OF MICRODISSECTED TUMOR "CUBOIDS" IN HYDROGELS.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Swathi SwaminathanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9824-354X
Qudus HamidDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0321-0217
Wei SunDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America.
Alisa Morss ClyneDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America.

Funding

The effect of laminar and disturbed flow on endothelial glucose metabolismR01HL140239 · NHLBI · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI MORSS CLYNE, ALISA S · 2018 to 2022
$1.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL140239
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

3D human cancer models provide a better platform for drug efficacy studies than conventional 2D culture, since they recapitulate important aspects of the in vivo microenvironment. While biofabrication has advanced model creation, bioprinting generally involves extruding individual cells in a bioink and then waiting for these cells to self-assemble into a hierarchical 3D tissue. This self-assembly is time consuming and requires complex cellular interactions with other cell types, extracellular matrix components, and growth factors. We therefore investigated if we could directly bioprint pre-formed 3D spheroids in alginate-based bioinks to create a model tissue that could be used almost immediately. Human breast epithelial cell lines were bioprinted as individual cells or as pre-formed spheroids, either in monoculture or co-culture with vascular endothelial cells. While individual breast cells only spontaneously formed spheroids in Matrigel-based bioink, pre-formed breast spheroids maintained their viability, architecture, and function after bioprinting. Bioprinted breast spheroids were more resistant to paclitaxel than individually printed breast cells; however, this effect was abrogated by endothelial cell co-culture. This study shows that 3D cellular structure bioprinting has potential to create tissue models that quickly replicate the tumor microenvironment.

Indexed as

BioprintingBreastCell LineCell SurvivalCoculture TechniquesEpithelial CellsFemaleHumansHuman Umbilical Vein Endothelial CellsModels, BiologicalNeoplasmsPaclitaxelSpheroids, CellularPaclitaxel

Identifiers

PMID30616234
PMCPMC7731635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.