Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30615683›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2019

Comparison of Mycobacterium ulcerans (Buruli ulcer) and Leptospira sp. (Leptospirosis) dynamics in urban and rural settings.

Marine Combe, Rodolphe Elie Gozlan, Soushieta Jagadesh, Camilla Jensen Velvin, Rolland Ruffine, Magalie Pierre Demar, Pierre Couppié, Felix Djossou, Mathieu Nacher, Loïc Epelboin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Marine CombeISEM UMR226, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, EPHE, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0708-9234
Rodolphe Elie GozlanISEM UMR226, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, EPHE, Montpellier, France.
Soushieta JagadeshISEM UMR226, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, EPHE, Montpellier, France.
Camilla Jensen VelvinISEM UMR226, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, EPHE, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8689-839X
Rolland RuffineMIVEGEC, IRD, CNRS, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, Centre IRD de Cayenne, Guyane française.
Magalie Pierre DemarEquipe EA 3593, Ecosystèmes amazoniens et pathologie tropicale, Université de la Guyane, Cayenne, Guyane française.
Pierre CouppiéEquipe EA 3593, Ecosystèmes amazoniens et pathologie tropicale, Université de la Guyane, Cayenne, Guyane française.
Felix DjossouEquipe EA 3593, Ecosystèmes amazoniens et pathologie tropicale, Université de la Guyane, Cayenne, Guyane française.
Mathieu NacherCentre d'investigation clinique (CIC Inserm 1424), Centre hospitalier Andrée Rosemon, Guyane française.
Loïc EpelboinEquipe EA 3593, Ecosystèmes amazoniens et pathologie tropicale, Université de la Guyane, Cayenne, Guyane française.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundZoonotic pathogens respond to changes in host range and/or pathogen, vector and host ecology. Environmental changes (biodiversity, habitat changes, variability in climate), even at a local level, lead to variability in environmental pathogen dynamics and can facilitate their transmission from natural reservoirs to new susceptible hosts. Whilst the environmental dynamics of aquatic bacteria are directly linked to seasonal changes of their habitat they also rely on the ecological processes underpining their transmission. However data allowing the comparison of these ecological processes are lacking. Here we compared the environmental dynamics of generalist and vector-borne aquatic bacterial pathogens in the same unit of time and space, and across rural and urban habitats in French Guiana (South America). PRINCIPAL

findingsUsing Leptospira sp. and Mycobacterium ulcerans we performed an environmental survey that allowed the detection of both pathogens in urban vs. rural areas, and during rainy vs. dry weather conditions. All samples were subjected to qPCR amplifications of LipL32 (Leptospira sp.) and IS2404 and KR (M. ulcerans) genetic markers. We found (i) a greater presence of M. ulcerans in rural areas compared with Leptospira sp., (ii) that modified urban environments were more favourable to the establishment of both pathogens, (iii) that Leptospira sp. presence was enhanced during the rainy season and M. ulcerans during the dry period, and (iv) differences in the spatial distribution of both bacteria across urban sites, probably due to the mode of dissemination of each pathogen in the environment.

conclusionsWe propose that in French Guiana simplified and modified urban ecosystems might favour leptospirosis and Buruli ulcer emergence and transmission. Moreover, disease risk was also constrained by seasonality. We suggest that the prevention of aquatic bacterial disease emergence in impoverished urban areas of developing countries would benefit from seasonal diseases targeted surveys, which would maximise limited budgets from cash-strapped health agencies.

Indexed as

Environmental MicrobiologyFrench GuianaHumansLeptospiraMycobacterium ulceransRural PopulationSeasonsSpatio-Temporal AnalysisUrban Population

Identifiers

PMID30615683
PMCPMC6336349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.