Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30615678›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

A geospatial approach to understanding inequalities in accessibility to primary care among vulnerable populations.

Jason A Gilliland, Tayyab I Shah, Andrew Clark, Shannon Sibbald, Jamie A Seabrook

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Spatial accessibility and equity of primary healthcare in Zhejiang, China.International journal for equity in health · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Regional differences in access to direct-acting antiviral treatments for hepatitis C across Ontario: A cross-sectional study.Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. A Spatio-Temporal Analysis of the Health Situation in Poland Based on Functional Discriminant Coordinates.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jason A GillilandDepartment of Geography, Western University, London, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2909-2178
Tayyab I ShahDepartment of Geography, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Andrew ClarkDepartment of Geography, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Shannon SibbaldSchool of Health Studies, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Jamie A SeabrookHuman Environments Analysis Laboratory, Western University, London, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many Canadians experience unequal access to primary care services, despite living in a country with a universal health care system. Health inequalities affect all Canadians but have a much stronger impact on the health of vulnerable populations. Health inequalities are preventable differences in the health status or distribution of health resources as experienced by vulnerable populations. A geospatial approach was applied to examine how closely the distribution of primary care providers (PCPs) in London, Ontario meet the needs of vulnerable populations, including people with low income status, seniors, lone parents, and linguistic minorities. Using enhanced two step floating catchment area (E2SFCA) method, an index of geographic access scores for all PCPs and PCPs speaking French, Arabic, and Spanish were separately developed at the dissemination area (DA) level. To analyze how PCPs are distributed, comparative analyses were performed in association with specific vulnerable groups. Geographical accessibility to all PCPs, and PCPs who speak specific minority languages vary considerably across the city of London. Access scores for French- and Arabic-speaking PCPs are found comparatively high (mean = 2.85 and 1.01 respectively) as compared to Spanish-speaking PCPs (mean = 0.47). Additionally, many areas with high proportions of vulnerable populations experience low accessibility. Despite its exploratory nature, this study offers insight into intra-urban distributions of geographical accessibility to primary care resources for vulnerable groups. These findings can facilitate health researchers and policymakers in the development of recommendations to increase levels of accessibility of specific population groups in underserved areas.

Indexed as

AgedCatchment Area, HealthCommunication BarriersEmigrants and ImmigrantsHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Services AccessibilityHumansLanguageMiddle AgedOntarioPrimary Health CareSocioeconomic FactorsSpatial AnalysisVulnerable Populations

Identifiers

PMID30615678
PMCPMC6322734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.