Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30615661›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2019

Clinical utility of MRI in the decision-making process before radical prostatectomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Mieszko Kozikowski, Wojciech Malewski, Wojciech Michalak, Jakub Dobruch

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Visual extended reality tools in image-guided surgery in urology: a systematic review.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Quantitative Prostate MRI, From theAJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Prostate Cancer Local Staging with Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Radiologic clinics of North America · 2024
    Review
  12. Effect of preoperative PI-RADS assessment on pathological outcomes in patients who underwent radical prostatectomy.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Direct Patlak Reconstruction of [International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mieszko KozikowskiDepartment of Urology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7533-4297
Wojciech MalewskiDepartment of Urology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.
Wojciech MichalakDepartment of Urology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.
Jakub DobruchDepartment of Urology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.
Postgraduate School of Molecular Medicine · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is currently the most accurate imaging modality to assess local prostate cancer stage. Despite a growing body of evidence, incorporation of MRI images into decision-making process concerning surgical template of radical prostatectomy, is complex and still poorly understood.

objectiveWe sought to determine the value of MRI in preoperative planning before radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND

methodsSystematic search through electronic PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases from 2000 up to April 2018 was performed. Only studies that used preoperative MRI in decision-making process regarding extension of resection in patients with prostate cancer, in whom radical prostatectomy was an initial form of treatment were included into analysis. Their quality was scored by Risk Of Bias In Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions system. Meta-analysis was performed to calculate the weighted summary proportion under the fixed or random effects model as appropriate and pooled effects were depicted on forest plots.

resultsThe results showed that the preoperative MRI led to the modification of initial surgical template in one third of cases (35%). This occurred increasingly with the rising prostate cancer-risk category: 28%, 33%, 52% in low-, intermediate- and high-risk group, respectively. Modification of neurovascular bundle-sparing surgery based on MRI appeared to have no impact on the positive surgical margin rate. The decision based on MRI was correct on average in 77% of cases and differed across prostate cancer-risk categories: 63%, 75% and 91% in low-, intermediate- and high-risk group, accordingly.

conclusionsIn summary, MRI has a considerable impact on the decision-making process regarding the extent of resection during radical prostatectomy. Adaptation of MRI images by operating surgeons has at worst no significant impact on surgical margin status, however its ability to decrease the positive surgical margin rates remains unconfirmed.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingPatient Care PlanningClinical Decision-MakingHumansMaleMargins of ExcisionPreoperative CareProstateProstatectomyProstatic Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID30615661
PMCPMC6322775
OpenAlexW2909323151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.