ArticlePloS one2019
Ex vivo biophysical characterization of a hydrogel-based artificial vitreous substitute.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Vitreous Substitutes in Vitreoretinal Surgery: From Native Vitreous Physiology to Bioengineered Experimental Replacements.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- Replacing the vitreous body with hydrogels: Rationale and strategies.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2025Review
- In vivo evaluation of a Nano-enabled therapeutic vitreous substitute for the precise delivery of triamcinolone to the posterior segment of the eye.Drug delivery and translational research · 2024Article
- Viscoelastic, Optical, and Surgical Properties of Vitreous Body Replacement Hydrogels After Aging Compared to Porcine Vitreous Bodies And Silicone Oils.Translational vision science & technology · 2024Article
- Smart molecules in ophthalmology: Hydrogels as responsive systems for ophthalmic applications.Smart molecules : open access · 2024Review
- Forward Light Scattering of First to Third Generation Vitreous Body Replacement Hydrogels after Surgical Application Compared to Conventional Silicone Oils and Vitreous Body.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Advances in Polysaccharide- and Synthetic Polymer-Based Vitreous Substitutes.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Vitreous Substitutes from Bench to the Operating Room in a Translational Approach: Review and Future Endeavors in Vitreoretinal Surgery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Long-Term Biocompatibility of a Highly Viscously Thiol-Modified Cross-Linked Hyaluronate as a Novel Vitreous Body Substitute.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- Efficacy, Drug Sensitivity, and Safety of a Chronic Ocular Hypertension Rat Model Established Using a Single Intracameral Injection of Hydrogel into the Anterior Chamber.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2020Article
- Effect on rabbits' intraocular structure by cross-linked hyaluronic formations as vitreous substitute.International journal of ophthalmology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo characterize the biophysical properties of an artificial vitreous body substitute (VBS), which consists of a biocompatible, cross-linked, hyaluronic acid (HA)-based hydrogel, by analysing the VBS's influence on intraocular pressure (IOP) and retinal integrity in distinct ex vivo eye models in order to evaluate the its potential for in vivo biocompatibility testing.
methodsPig eyes were obtained immediately postmortem, and VBS was injected after core-vitrectomy. IOP was followed for 24 h (n = 5). VBS influence on retinal integrity was investigated using isolated bovine retinas superfused with an oxygen saturated nutrient solution. An electroretinogram (ERG) was recorded on explanted bovine retinae using silver/silver chloride electrodes; after application of VBS for 2 min, a washout period of 70 min was employed. The percentage of a-and b-wave reduction at the end of the washout phase was compared to baseline values (n = 5). Data were calculated throughout as the mean and the standard deviation. qRT-PCR (Bax/Bcl-2-ratio, GFAP- and PGP9.5-levels) or western blot analysis was used to test for toxicity of Princess Volume after 24 h (and β-3 tubulin with GAPDH as a control gene). Significance was estimated by Student´s t-test; p ≤0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
resultsThe IOP increased non-significantly by 10% after 24 h. Short-term biocompatibility testing using isolated superfused bovine retinas showed neither significant reductions of the b-wave nor the a-wave amplitudes (b-wave reduction 14.2%, p>0.05; a-wave reduction 23.9%, p>0.05). qRT-PCR and western blot analysis did not reveal significant toxicity after 24 h.
conclusionsThe manufactured HA-based hydrogel showed highly favourable biophysical characteristics in the explored ex vivo models, justifying in vivo studies enabling the assessment of biocompatibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.