Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30615634›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

A qualitative exploration of women's experiences of antenatal and intrapartum care: The need for a woman-centred approach in the Peruvian Amazon.

Harriet Marsland, Graciela Meza, Gilles de Wildt, Laura Jones

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Indigenous communities of Peru: Level of accessibility to health facilities.Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Harriet MarslandCollege of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2317-5383
Graciela MezaFacultad de Medicina Humana, Universidad Nacional de la Amazonia Peruana, Iquitos, Peru.
Gilles de WildtCollege of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Laura JonesInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4018-3855
University of Birmingham · GBUniversidad Nacional de la Amazonía Peruana · PE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore women's experiences and perceptions of antenatal and intrapartum care in the Peruvian Amazon, including their perceived motivators, enablers and barriers to accessing care.

designInterpretive descriptive qualitative study using semi-structured face-to-face interviews.

settingPrimary healthcare centre, Iquitos, Peru.

participantsWomen (n = 20) attending the healthcare centre who had given birth in the past 6 months. MEASURES: Interviews were conducted using a female interpreter, transcribed clean verbatim and thematically analysed.

findingsFour core themes relating to antenatal care were interpreted. (1) Perceived knowledge of antenatal care and its importance: women generally understood the importance of care, mainly for their baby's health rather than their own. (2) Appointments and information received: women wanted more appointments to facilitate greater depth of information relating to their pregnancy. (3) Interaction with healthcare practitioners: women felt they received inadequate attention, care lacked continuity and they were often uncomfortable with male practitioners. (4) Perceived motivators, barriers and enablers to accessing antenatal care: Knowledge of the importance of care acted as the main motivator. Few direct barriers were identified, other than employment. Free care and ease of access enabled attendance. Two core themes were interpreted relating to intrapartum care. (1) Expectations and preferences for labour and delivery: the need for a safe environment for childbirth was acknowledged. (2) Actual experiences of labour and delivery: for most women labour and delivery experiences were not as they had expected. Women objected less to male professionals during labour than antenatal care. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Women reported negative experiences of both antenatal and intrapartum care. There is clearly a need for a more woman-centred approach to care and service provision. Ideally, this would involve employing more staff, acknowledging the implications on resources, improving attitudes towards women, facilitating continuity of care, and allowing patient choice to give women greater involvement.

Indexed as

Delivery, ObstetricMaternal HealthPrenatal CareWomen's HealthAdultContinuity of Patient CareFemaleHumansPeruPregnancyProfessional-Patient RelationsQualitative ResearchYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30615634
PMCPMC6322728
OpenAlexW2910054052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.