Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30615627›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Deep learning image recognition enables efficient genome editing in zebrafish by automated injections.

Maria Lorena Cordero-Maldonado, Simon Perathoner, Kees-Jan van der Kolk, Ralf Boland, Ursula Heins-Marroquin, Herman P Spaink, Annemarie H Meijer, Alexander D Crawford, Jan de Sonneville

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Deep learning in CRISPR-Cas systems: a review of recent studies.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Maria Lorena Cordero-MaldonadoLuxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine, University of Luxembourg, Belvaux, Luxembourg.ORCID 0000-0001-5631-0022
Simon PerathonerLuxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine, University of Luxembourg, Belvaux, Luxembourg.
Kees-Jan van der KolkLife Science Methods BV, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Ralf BolandInstitute of Biology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1463-5977
Ursula Heins-MarroquinLuxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine, University of Luxembourg, Belvaux, Luxembourg.
Herman P SpainkInstitute of Biology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Annemarie H MeijerInstitute of Biology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Alexander D CrawfordLuxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine, University of Luxembourg, Belvaux, Luxembourg.
Jan de SonnevilleLife Science Methods BV, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6399-7042

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the most popular techniques in zebrafish research is microinjection. This is a rapid and efficient way to genetically manipulate early developing embryos, and to introduce microbes, chemical compounds, nanoparticles or tracers at larval stages. Here we demonstrate the development of a machine learning software that allows for microinjection at a trained target site in zebrafish eggs at unprecedented speed. The software is based on the open-source deep-learning library Inception v3. In a first step, the software distinguishes wells containing embryos at one-cell stage from wells to be skipped with an accuracy of 93%. A second step was developed to pinpoint the injection site. Deep learning allows to predict this location on average within 42 μm to manually annotated sites. Using a Graphics Processing Unit (GPU), both steps together take less than 100 milliseconds. We first tested our system by injecting a morpholino into the middle of the yolk and found that the automated injection efficiency is as efficient as manual injection (~ 80%). Next, we tested both CRISPR/Cas9 and DNA construct injections into the zygote and obtained a comparable efficiency to that of an experienced experimentalist. Combined with a higher throughput, this results in a higher yield. Hence, the automated injection of CRISPR/Cas9 will allow high-throughput applications to knock out and knock in relevant genes to study their mechanisms or pathways of interest in diverse areas of biomedical research.

Indexed as

Deep LearningZebrafishAnimalsEmbryonic DevelopmentEmbryo, NonmammalianGene EditingGene Knock-In TechniquesMicroinjections

Identifiers

PMID30615627
PMCPMC6322765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.