Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30615616›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2019

Functional divergence of a global regulatory complex governing fungal filamentation.

Elizabeth J Polvi, Amanda O Veri, Zhongle Liu, Saif Hossain, Sabrina Hyde, Sang Hu Kim, Faiza Tebbji, Adnane Sellam, Robert T Todd, Jinglin L Xie and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Imaging-Based Screening Identifies Modulators of theAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2023
    Article
  3. Imaging-based screening identifies modulators of thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Transcriptional Circuits Regulating Developmental Processes inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Elizabeth J PolviDepartment of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7827-826X
Amanda O VeriDepartment of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1764-8439
Zhongle LiuDepartment of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Saif HossainDepartment of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9908-4958
Sabrina HydeDepartment of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3529-8647
Sang Hu KimDepartment of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0597-0623
Faiza TebbjiInfectious Disease Research Centre, Université Laval, Quebec, Canada.
Adnane SellamInfectious Disease Research Centre, Université Laval, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0506-7752
Robert T ToddDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, Nebraska, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4522-7124
Jinglin L XieDepartment of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7373-3449
Zhen-Yuan LinLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Ontario, Canada.
Cassandra J WongLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Ontario, Canada.
Rebecca S ShapiroDepartment of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7119-8865
Malcolm WhitewayDepartment of Biology, Concordia University, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6619-7983
Nicole RobbinsDepartment of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Anne-Claude GingrasDepartment of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Anna SelmeckiDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, Nebraska, United States of America.
Leah E CowenDepartment of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5797-0110
University of Toronto · CAMount Sinai Hospital · CACreighton University · USUniversité Laval · CAConcordia University · CA

Funding

CIHR FDN-143301CIHR FDN-154288
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Morphogenetic transitions are prevalent in the fungal kingdom. For a leading human fungal pathogen, Candida albicans, the capacity to transition between yeast and filaments is key for virulence. For the model yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, filamentation enables nutrient acquisition. A recent functional genomic screen in S. cerevisiae identified Mfg1 as a regulator of morphogenesis that acts in complex with Flo8 and Mss11 to mediate transcriptional responses crucial for filamentation. In C. albicans, Mfg1 also interacts physically with Flo8 and Mss11 and is critical for filamentation in response to diverse cues, but the mechanisms through which it regulates morphogenesis remained elusive. Here, we explored the consequences of perturbation of Mfg1, Flo8, and Mss11 on C. albicans morphogenesis, and identified functional divergence of complex members. We observed that C. albicans Mss11 was dispensable for filamentation, and that overexpression of FLO8 caused constitutive filamentation even in the absence of Mfg1. Harnessing transcriptional profiling and chromatin immunoprecipitation coupled to microarray analysis, we identified divergence between transcriptional targets of Flo8 and Mfg1 in C. albicans. We also established that Flo8 and Mfg1 cooperatively bind to promoters of key regulators of filamentation, including TEC1, for which overexpression was sufficient to restore filamentation in the absence of Flo8 or Mfg1. To further explore the circuitry through which Mfg1 regulates morphogenesis, we employed a novel strategy to select for mutations that restore filamentation in the absence of Mfg1. Whole genome sequencing of filamentation-competent mutants revealed chromosome 6 amplification as a conserved adaptive mechanism. A key determinant of the chromosome 6 amplification is FLO8, as deletion of one allele blocked morphogenesis, and chromosome 6 was not amplified in evolved lineages for which FLO8 was re-located to a different chromosome. Thus, this work highlights rewiring of key morphogenetic regulators over evolutionary time and aneuploidy as an adaptive mechanism driving fungal morphogenesis.

Indexed as

Candida albicansFungal ProteinsFungiGene Expression Regulation, FungalHumansHyphaeMorphogenesisMultiprotein ComplexesNuclear ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTrans-ActivatorsTranscription FactorsFLO8 protein, S cerevisaieFungal ProteinsMSS11 protein, S cerevisiaeMultiprotein ComplexesNuclear ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTrans-ActivatorsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID30615616
PMCPMC6336345
OpenAlexW2908351263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.