ArticleJournal of oncology practice2019
Advanced Practice Providers and Survivorship Care: They Can Deliver.
Article in Journal of oncology practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Baseline characteristics of survivors, primary care clinicians, and oncologists in a randomized trial of a shared care, self-management intervention for cancer survivors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Trial
- The Current Cardio-Oncology Landscape Across Australia.Current treatment options in oncology · 2026Review
- Advanced Practice Providers in Oncology Care: Consensus Principles for Clinical Practice Utilization.Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology · 2026Article
- Use of the Survivors' Unmet Needs Survey (SUNS) Framework to Understand the Needs of Colorectal Cancer Survivors in Thailand: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The cardio-oncology multidisciplinary team: beyond the basics.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2025Review
- Oncology, Primary Care, and Survivorship: Time for Onco-primary Care?JCO oncology practice · 2025Article
- A qualitative analysis of algorithm-based decision support usability testing for symptom management across the trajectory of cancer care: one size does not fit all.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- Defining the Role of the Advanced Practice Provider Within the National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program.JCO oncology practice · 2024Article
- Availability of cancer survivorship support services across the National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program network.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2024Article
- Feasibility, acceptability, and utility of a nurse-led survivorship program for people with metastatic melanoma (MELCARE).Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022Article
- Improved models of care for cancer survivors.Lancet (London, England) · 2022Review
- Head and neck cancer survivorship consensus statement from the American Head and Neck Society.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2022Review
- The development and implementation of the After Cancer Treatment Transition (ACTT) Program for survivors of cancer.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2022Article
- Article
- Rationale and Design of a Telehealth Self-Management, Shared Care Intervention for Post-treatment Survivors of Lung and Colorectal Cancer.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2021Article
- Healthy Behaviors: Prevalence of Uptake Among Cancer Survivors.Clinical journal of oncology nursing · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAs the number of cancer survivors grows, new models of survivorship care are being implemented, but there is limited evaluation to date. This retrospective review assesses the concordance of care provided to adult-onset cancer survivors by advanced practice providers (nurse practitioners and physician assistants) with Institute of Medicine guidelines for survivorship care.
methodsRecords from three survivorship clinics at a single institution were reviewed for frequency of recurrence surveillance, screening for second cancers, symptom management (physical, psychological), health promotion education (alcohol, tobacco, cholesterol, and bone density screenings; diet/exercise discussion), care coordination, and provision of care plan. Data were characterized using descriptive statistics.
resultsOver 2 years, 9,052 unique survivorship visits occurred; 210 breast, 208 prostate, and 204 colorectal visits were randomly selected for review. All patients with breast cancer underwent surveillance for recurrence; 99% were screened for new cancers. Discussion of health promotion activities ranged from 83% to 100%; 91% of patients were reviewed for physical symptoms, and 93% were reviewed for psychological symptoms. All patients with prostate cancer underwent recurrence surveillance; 97% were screened for new primaries. Health promotion activities ranged from 70% to 97%, and symptoms were discussed in 89% of visits. All patients with colorectal cancer underwent a surveillance colonoscopy for recurrence; 97% had a carcinoembryonic antigen test. Among women, 97% had mammograms, and 96% had a Papanicolaou test; 83% of men had a prostate-specific antigen test. Health promotion activities ranged from 69% to 100%, and symptoms were discussed in 93% to 97% of visits.
conclusionsFindings suggest that advanced practice providers can provide survivorship care in accordance with Institute of Medicine standards, which provide a normative standard. This assessment is an important step in evaluating survivorship outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.