Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30615493›Full record

ArticleJournal of athletic training2018

Ultrasonographic Assessment of Femoral Cartilage in Individuals With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Case-Control Study.

Matthew S Harkey, J Troy Blackburn, Daniel Nissman, Hope Davis, Isaac Durrington, Christina Rizk, Alexa Kuismanen, Brian Pietrosimone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of athletic training, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Femoral cartilage ultrasound echo-intensity is a valid measure of cartilage composition.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Matthew S HarkeyDivision of Rheumatology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, and Department of Quantitative Health Science, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester.
J Troy BlackburnDepartment of Exercise and Sports Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Daniel NissmanDepartment of Radiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Hope DavisDepartment of Exercise and Sports Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Isaac DurringtonUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis.
Christina RizkDepartment of Exercise and Sports Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Alexa KuismanenUniversity of Glasgow, Scotland.
Brian PietrosimoneDepartment of Exercise and Sports Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextDeveloping osteoarthritis is common after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Monitoring changes in femoral cartilage size after ACLR may be a way to detect the earliest structural alterations before the radiographic onset of osteoarthritis. Diagnostic ultrasonography (US) offers a clinically accessible and valid method for evaluating anterior femoral cartilage size.

objectiveTo compare the US measurements of anterior femoral cross-sectional area and cartilage thickness between limbs in individuals with a unilateral ACLR and between the ACLR limbs of these individuals and the limbs of uninjured control participants.

designCase-control study.

settingResearch laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER

participantsA total of 20 volunteers with an ACLR (37.0 ± 26.6 months after surgery) and 28 uninjured volunteers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): We used US to assess anterior femoral cartilage cross-sectional area and thickness (ie, medial, lateral, and intercondylar) in the ACLR and contralateral limbs of participants with ACLR and unilaterally in the reference limbs of uninjured participants.

resultsThe ACLR limb presented with greater anterior femoral cartilage cross-sectional area (96.68 ± 22.68 mm

conclusionsAnterior femoral cartilage cross-sectional area and thickness assessed via US were greater in the ACLR limb than in the contralateral and uninjured limbs. Greater thickness and cross-sectional area may have been due to cartilage swelling or hypertrophy after ACLR, which may affect the long-term health of the joint.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionAnterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesCartilage, ArticularCase-Control StudiesFemaleFemurHumansKnee JointMaleOsteoarthritis, KneeUltrasonographyYoung Adultcartilage cross-sectional areacartilage thicknessdiagnostic imagingknee

Identifiers

PMID30615493
PMCPMC6333222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.