Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30615132›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2019

Enhanced Population Coding for Rewarded Choices in the Medial Frontal Cortex of the Mouse.

Michael J Siniscalchi, Hongli Wang, Alex C Kwan

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Autism-associatedProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael J SiniscalchiInterdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Hongli WangInterdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Alex C KwanInterdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Yale University · US

Funding

Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program (INP)T32NS041228 · NINDS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Charles A Greer, Marina R Picciotto · 2001 to 2026
$12.0M
Yale Alzheimer Disease Research CenterP50AG047270 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MAROTTOLI, RICHARD · 2015 to 2019
$8.3M
Frontal cortical neural dynamics and chronic social stressR01MH112750 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI KWAN, CHUN-HAY ALEX · 2017 to 2021
$2.1M
Frontal cholinergic signals during value-based decision-makingR21MH118596 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI KWAN, CHUN-HAY ALEX · 2018 to 2019
$461k
NIA NIH HHS P50 AG047270NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH112750NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH118596NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS041228
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Instrumental behavior is characterized by the selection of actions based on the degree to which they lead to a desired outcome. However, we lack a detailed understanding of how rewarded actions are reinforced and preferentially implemented. In rodents, the medial frontal cortex is hypothesized to play an important role in this process, based in part on its capacity to encode chosen actions and their outcomes. We therefore asked how neural representations of choice and outcome might interact to facilitate instrumental behavior. To investigate this question, we imaged neural ensemble activity in layer 2/3 of the secondary motor region (M2) while mice engaged in a two-choice auditory discrimination task with probabilistic outcomes. Correct choices could result in one of three reward amounts (single, double or omitted reward), which allowed us to measure neural and behavioral effects of reward magnitude, as well as its categorical presence or absence. Single-unit and population decoding analyses revealed a consistent influence of outcome on choice signals in M2. Specifically, rewarded choices were more robustly encoded relative to unrewarded choices, with little dependence on the exact magnitude of reinforcement. Our results provide insight into the integration of past choices and outcomes in the rodent brain during instrumental behavior.

Indexed as

RewardAcoustic StimulationAnimalsChoice BehaviorDiscrimination, PsychologicalMaleMice, Inbred C57BLMotor CortexNeuronsOptical Imagingchoice historyensemble activitygoal-directed actionssecondary motor cortextwo-photon calcium imaging

Identifiers

PMID30615132
PMCPMC6735259
OpenAlexW2949747935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.