Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30615074›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2019

Toxin Enzyme Immunoassays Detect Clostridioides difficile Infection With Greater Severity and Higher Recurrence Rates.

Alice Y Guh, Kelly M Hatfield, Lisa G Winston, Brittany Martin, Helen Johnston, Geoffrey Brousseau, Monica M Farley, Lucy Wilson, Rebecca Perlmutter, Erin C Phipps and 8 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Microbiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  7. Gastro hep advances · 2026
    Article
  8. Three stages of laboratory stewardship in improving appropriateAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Microorganisms · 2024
    Article
  11. Potential underreporting of treated patients using aInfection control and hospital epidemiology · 2024
    Observational
  12. Article
  13. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Novel Biomarkers, IncludingInfection and immunity · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Comparison of the Risk of RecurrentOpen forum infectious diseases · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Alice Y GuhCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Kelly M HatfieldCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Lisa G WinstonSchool of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.
Brittany MartinCalifornia Emerging Infections Program, Oakland.
Helen JohnstonColorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Denver.
Geoffrey BrousseauColorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Denver.
Monica M FarleyEmory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Lucy WilsonMaryland Department of Health, Baltimore.
Rebecca PerlmutterMaryland Department of Health, Baltimore.
Erin C PhippsUniversity of New Mexico, Albuquerque.
Ghinwa K DumyatiNew York Emerging Infections Program and University of Rochester Medical Center, Nashville.
Deborah NelsonNew York Emerging Infections Program and University of Rochester Medical Center, Nashville.
Trupti HatwarNew York Emerging Infections Program and University of Rochester Medical Center, Nashville.
Marion A KainerTennessee Department of Health, Nashville.
Ashley L PaulickCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Maria KarlssonCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Dale N GerdingStritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood.
L Clifford McDonaldCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USUniversity of Rochester Medical Center · USColorado Department of Public Health and Environment · USMaryland Department of Health · USEmory University · USIbis Reproductive Health · USLoyola University Chicago · USTennessee Department of Health · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of New Mexico · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFew data suggest that Clostridioides difficile infections (CDIs) detected by toxin enzyme immunoassay (EIA) are more severe and have worse outcomes than those detected by nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) only. We compared toxin- positive and NAAT-positive-only CDI across geographically diverse sites.

methodsA case was defined as a positive C. difficile test in a person ≥1 year old with no positive tests in the prior 8 weeks. Cases were detected during 2014-2015 by a testing algorithm (specimens initially tested by glutamate dehydrogenase and toxin EIA; if discordant results, specimens were reflexed to NAAT) and classified as toxin positive or NAAT positive only. Medical charts were reviewed. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to compare CDI-related complications, recurrence, and 30-day mortality between the 2 groups.

resultsOf 4878 cases, 2160 (44.3%) were toxin positive and 2718 (55.7%) were NAAT positive only. More toxin-positive than NAAT-positive-only cases were aged ≥65 years (48.2% vs 38.0%; P < .0001), had ≥3 unformed stools for ≥1 day (43.9% vs 36.6%; P < .0001), and had white blood cell counts ≥15 000 cells/µL (31.4% vs 21.4%; P < .0001). In multivariable analysis, toxin positivity was associated with recurrence (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.61-2.23), but not with CDI-related complications (aOR, 0.91; 95% CI, .67-1.23) or 30-day mortality (aOR, 0.95; 95% CI, .73-1.24).

conclusionsToxin-positive CDI is more severe, but there were no differences in adjusted CDI-related complication and mortality rates between toxin-positive and NAAT-positive-only CDI that were detected by an algorithm that utilized an initial glutamate dehydrogenase screening test.

Indexed as

Immunoenzyme TechniquesAdolescentAdultAgedAlgorithmsBacterial ProteinsBacterial ToxinsChildChild, PreschoolClinical Laboratory TechniquesClostridioides difficileClostridium InfectionsFecesFemaleHumansInfantBacterial ProteinsBacterial ToxinsCDIClostridioides difficile infectiondiagnostic testingoutcomes

Identifiers

PMID30615074
PMCPMC6612464
OpenAlexW2910347515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.