Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30615038›Full record

ArticleJAMA neurology2019

Mediation of the Relationship Between Endovascular Therapy and Functional Outcome by Follow-up Infarct Volume in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Anna M M Boers, Ivo G H Jansen, Scott Brown, Hester F Lingsma, Ludo F M Beenen, Thomas G Devlin, Luis San Román, Ji-Hoe Heo, Marc Ribó, Mohammed A Almekhlafi and 42 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Intensive versus less intensive blood pressure targets after mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Reperfusion-dependent treatment effects of thrombectomy in patients with large ischemic infarcts.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2026
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

52 authors at 20 institutions in 10 countries.

Anna M M BoersDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Ivo G H JansenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Scott BrownAltair Biostatistics, Mooresville, North Carolina.
Hester F LingsmaDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Ludo F M BeenenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Thomas G DevlinDepartment of Neurology, Erlanger Hospital, University of Tennessee at Chattanooga.
Luis San RománDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Ji-Hoe HeoDepartment of Neurology, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea.
Marc RibóDepartment of Neurology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Mohammed A AlmekhlafiDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
David S LiebeskindDepartment of Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles.
Jeanne TeitelbaumDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Patricia CuadrasDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Richard du Mesnil de RochemontDepartment of Radiology, Goethe University Hospital, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Marine BeaumontInserm CIC-IT 1433, University of Lorraine and University Hospital of Nancy, Nancy, France.
Martin M BrownInstitute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Albert J YooDivision of Neurointervention, Texas Stroke Institute, Dallas.
Geoffrey A DonnanThe Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Melbourne Brain Centre at the Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jean Louis MasDepartment of Neurology, Sainte-Anne Hospital and Paris-Descartes University, INSERM U894, Paris, France.
Catherine OppenheimDepartment of Neuroradiology, Sainte-Anne Hospital and Paris-Descartes University, INSERM U894, Paris, France.
Richard J DowlingDepartment of Radiology, Melbourne Brain Centre at the Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Thierry MoulinDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital of Besançon, University of Franche-Comté, Besançon, France.
Nelly AgrinierInserm, Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Nancy, Université de Lorraine, CIC1433-Epidémiologie Clinique, Nancy, France.
Demetrius K LopesDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Lucía Aja RodríguezNeuroradiology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Kars C J CompagneDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Fahad S Al-AjlanDepartment of Neurosciences, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Jeremy MadiganSt George's University Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Gregory W AlbersDepartment of Neurology, Stanford Stroke Center, Palo Alto, California.
Sebastien SoizeDepartment of Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Reims, Reims, France.
Jordi BlascoDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Stephen M DavisDepartment of Medicine and Neurology, Melbourne Brain Centre at the Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Raul G NogueiraDepartment of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Radiology, Grady Memorial Hospital, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Antoni DávalosDepartment of Neuroscience, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Bijoy K MenonDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Aad van der LugtDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Keith W MuirInstitute of Neuroscience and Psychology, University of Glasgow, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Yvo B W E M RoosDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Phil WhiteInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Peter J MitchellDepartment of Radiology, Melbourne Brain Centre at the Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Andrew M DemchukDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Wim H van ZwamDepartment of Radiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Tudor G JovinStroke Institute, Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Robert J van OostenbruggeDepartment of Neurology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Diederik W J DippelDepartment of Neurology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Bruce C V CampbellDepartment of Medicine and Neurology, Melbourne Brain Centre at the Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Francis GuilleminInserm, Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Nancy, Université de Lorraine, CIC1433-Epidémiologie Clinique, Nancy, France.
Serge BracardDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, INSERM U947, University of Lorraine and University Hospital of Nancy, Nancy, France.
Michael D HillDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Mayank GoyalDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Henk A MarqueringDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Charles B L M MajoieDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUErasmus MC · NLInserm · FRUniversity of Calgary · CADélégation Paris 5 · FRHospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESMaastricht University · NLUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESAltair Engineering (United States) · USBellvitge University Hospital · ESCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims · FRGoethe University Frankfurt · DEGrady Memorial Hospital · USKing Abdulaziz University · SAKing Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre · SAMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital · CANewcastle University · GBQueen Elizabeth University Hospital · GBRush University Medical Center · US

Funding

Department of Health HTA/14/08/47
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The positive treatment effect of endovascular therapy (EVT) is assumed to be caused by the preservation of brain tissue. It remains unclear to what extent the treatment-related reduction in follow-up infarct volume (FIV) explains the improved functional outcome after EVT in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Objective: To study whether FIV mediates the relationship between EVT and functional outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Design, Setting, and Participants: Patient data from 7 randomized multicenter trials were pooled. These trials were conducted between December 2010 and April 2015 and included 1764 patients randomly assigned to receive either EVT or standard care (control). Follow-up infarct volume was assessed on computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging after stroke onset. Mediation analysis was performed to examine the potential causal chain in which FIV may mediate the relationship between EVT and functional outcome. A total of 1690 patients met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-five additional patients were excluded, resulting in a total of 1665 patients, including 821 (49.3%) in the EVT group and 844 (50.7%) in the control group. Data were analyzed from January to June 2017. Main Outcome and Measure: The 90-day functional outcome via the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Results: Among 1665 patients, the median (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 68 (57-76) years, and 781 (46.9%) were female. The median (IQR) time to FIV measurement was 30 (24-237) hours. The median (IQR) FIV was 41 (14-120) mL. Patients in the EVT group had significantly smaller FIVs compared with patients in the control group (median [IQR] FIV, 33 [11-99] vs 51 [18-134] mL; P = .007) and lower mRS scores at 90 days (median [IQR] score, 3 [1-4] vs 4 [2-5]). Follow-up infarct volume was a predictor of functional outcome (adjusted common odds ratio, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.39-0.54; P < .001). Follow-up infarct volume partially mediated the relationship between treatment type with mRS score, as EVT was still significantly associated with functional outcome after adjustment for FIV (adjusted common odds ratio, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.52-3.21; P < .001). Treatment-reduced FIV explained 12% (95% CI, 1-19) of the relationship between EVT and functional outcome. Conclusions and Relevance: In this analysis, follow-up infarct volume predicted functional outcome; however, a reduced infarct volume after treatment with EVT only explained 12% of the treatment benefit. Follow-up infarct volume as measured on computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging is not a valid proxy for estimating treatment effect in phase II and III trials of acute ischemic stroke.

Indexed as

AgedBrain IschemiaCerebral InfarctionEndovascular ProceduresFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicOutcome Assessment, Health CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicStroke

Identifiers

PMID30615038
PMCPMC6439953
OpenAlexW2908494620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.