ArticleMedicine and science in sports and exercise2019
No Thermoregulatory Impairment in Skin Graft Donor Sites during Exercise-Heat Stress.
Article in Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Infrared Thermography as a Potential Non-Invasive Tool for Estrus Detection in Cattle and Buffaloes.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Review
- Human temperature regulation under heat stress in health, disease, and injury.Physiological reviews · 2022Review
- Edward F. Adolph Distinguished Lecture. It's more than skin deep: thermoregulatory and cardiovascular consequences of severe burn injuries in humans.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2021Article
- Burn Injury Does Not Exacerbate Heat Strain during Exercise while Wearing Body Armor.Medicine and science in sports and exercise · 2020Article
- Heat Adaptation in Military Personnel: Mitigating Risk, Maximizing Performance.Frontiers in physiology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The US Army's Standards of Medical Fitness, AR 40-501, state that "Prior burn injury (to include donor sites) involving a total body surface area of 40% or more does not meet the standard." Inclusion of donor sites (sites harvested for skin grafts) in this standard implies that thermoregulatory function is impaired within donor sites during exercise-heat stress; however, supporting evidence is currently lacking. PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that well-healed donor and noninjured sites demonstrate similar elevations in skin blood flow and sweating during exercise-induced hyperthermia.
methodsTwenty burn survivors (>1 yr postinjury; four females) cycled for 60 min in a 39.7°C ± 0.3°C and 21.1% ± 3.3% relative humidity environment at approximately 50% of maximal aerobic capacity. Core and mean skin temperatures were recorded throughout exercise. Skin blood flow (laser-Doppler imaging) was measured at baseline and after exercise within donor (LDFDON) and adjacent noninjured control (LDFCON) sites. At 45 min of exercise, local sweat rates (Technical Absorbents) were measured within the same donor (LSRDON) and noninjured (LSRCON) areas.
resultsAfter 60 min of exercise, core and skin temperatures reached 38.2°C ± 0.4°C and 35.5°C ± 1.2°C, respectively. The increase in skin blood flow from baseline to end-exercise (LDFDON, 91.6 ± 44.5 AU; LDFCON, 106.0 ± 61.6 AU; P = 0.17) and local sweat rates (LSRDON, 0.46 ± 0.26 mg·cm·min; LSRCON, 0.53 ± 0.25 mg·cm·min; P = 0.14) were not different between donor and noninjured control sites.
conclusionsWell-healed donor sites retain the ability to increase skin blood flow and sweating during exercise heat stress, providing evidence against the inclusion of donor sites when determining whether a burn injury meets the Army's Standards of Medical Fitness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.