ReviewHarvard review of psychiatry
Integrating Genomics into Psychiatric Practice: Ethical and Legal Challenges for Clinicians.
Review in Harvard review of psychiatry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Genetically guided precision medicine clinical decision support tools: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024Pooled it
- Genomics of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2025Review
- Ethical and social issues in prediction of risk of severe mental illness: a scoping review and thematic analysis.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
- Mapping the state-of-the-art of the barriers for personalized preventive approaches worldwide: A scoping review of reviews.PloS one · 2025Article
- Obstacles, Opportunities, and Ethical Considerations for Genomic Investigations of Individuals Continuously Hospitalized with Treatment-resistant Schizophrenia.Schizophrenia bulletin open · 2025Article
- Exploring the Intersection of Schizophrenia, Machine Learning, and Genomics: Scoping Review.JMIR bioinformatics and biotechnology · 2024Article
- The Ethics of Risk Prediction for Psychosis and Suicide Attempt in Youth Mental Health.The Journal of pediatrics · 2023Review
- Comparative neurogenetics of dog behavior complements efforts towards human neuropsychiatric genetics.Human genetics · 2023Review
- Concerns about the use of polygenic embryo screening for psychiatric and cognitive traits.The lancet. Psychiatry · 2022Review
- Ethical challenges of cord blood banks: a scoping review.Journal of medicine and life · 2022Article
- Nanotechnology Approaches for Enhanced CNS Drug Delivery in the Management of Schizophrenia.Advanced pharmaceutical bulletin · 2022Review
- Psychiatric genomics, mental health equity, and intersectionality: A framework for research and practice.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- Privacy considerations for sharing genomics data.EXCLI journal · 2021Review
- Precision Psychiatry: Biomarker-Guided Tailored Therapy for Effective Treatment and Prevention in Major Depression.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021Review
- International Society of Psychiatric Genetics Ethics Committee: Issues facing us.American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics · 2019Review
- Metabolomics Biomarkers for Precision Psychiatry.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Psychiatric genomics is a rapidly growing field that holds much promise for improving risk prediction, prevention, diagnosis, treatment selection, and understanding of the pathogenesis of patients' symptoms. The field of psychiatry (i.e., professional organizations, mental health clinicians, educational institutions), however, needs to address numerous challenges to promote the responsible translation of genomic technologies and knowledge into psychiatric practice. The goal of this article is to review how clinicians currently encounter and use genomics in the clinic, to summarize the existing literature on how clinicians feel about the use of genomics in psychiatry, and to analyze foreseeable ethical and legal challenges for the responsible integration of genomics into psychiatric care at the structural and clinic levels. Structural challenges are defined as aspects of the larger system of psychiatric practice that constitute potential barriers to the responsible integration of genomics for the purposes of psychiatric care and prevention. These structural challenges exist at a level where professional groups can intervene to set standards and regulate the practice of psychiatry and genomics. Clinic-level challenges are day-to-day issues clinicians face when managing genomic tests in the clinic. We discuss the need for action to mitigate these challenges and maximize the clinical and social utility of psychiatric genomics, including the following: expanding genomics training among mental health clinicians; establishing practice guidelines that consider potential clinical, psychological, and social implications of psychiatric genomics; promoting an integrated care model for managing genomics in psychiatry; emphasizing patient engagement and informed consent when managing genomic testing in psychiatric care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.