Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30614887›Full record

ReviewHarvard review of psychiatry

Integrating Genomics into Psychiatric Practice: Ethical and Legal Challenges for Clinicians.

Eric T Ward, Kristin M Kostick, Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Harvard review of psychiatry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Genetically guided precision medicine clinical decision support tools: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. International Society of Psychiatric Genetics Ethics Committee: Issues facing us.American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics · 2019
    Review
  16. Metabolomics Biomarkers for Precision Psychiatry.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eric T WardFrom the University of North Carolina School of Medicine (Dr. Ward); Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine (Drs. Kostick and Lázaro-Muñoz).
Kristin M Kostick
Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz

Funding

Neuroethics of aDBS Systems Targeting Neuropsychiatric and Movement DisordersR01MH114854 · NIMH · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI GOODMAN, WAYNE K, LAZARO-MUNOZ, GABRIEL · 2017 to 2020
$2.1M
Return of Results from Psychiatric Genomics Research: Attitudes and BarriersR00HG008689 · NHGRI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI LAZARO-MUNOZ, GABRIEL · 2017 to 2019
$905k
NHGRI NIH HHS R00 HG008689NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH114854
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psychiatric genomics is a rapidly growing field that holds much promise for improving risk prediction, prevention, diagnosis, treatment selection, and understanding of the pathogenesis of patients' symptoms. The field of psychiatry (i.e., professional organizations, mental health clinicians, educational institutions), however, needs to address numerous challenges to promote the responsible translation of genomic technologies and knowledge into psychiatric practice. The goal of this article is to review how clinicians currently encounter and use genomics in the clinic, to summarize the existing literature on how clinicians feel about the use of genomics in psychiatry, and to analyze foreseeable ethical and legal challenges for the responsible integration of genomics into psychiatric care at the structural and clinic levels. Structural challenges are defined as aspects of the larger system of psychiatric practice that constitute potential barriers to the responsible integration of genomics for the purposes of psychiatric care and prevention. These structural challenges exist at a level where professional groups can intervene to set standards and regulate the practice of psychiatry and genomics. Clinic-level challenges are day-to-day issues clinicians face when managing genomic tests in the clinic. We discuss the need for action to mitigate these challenges and maximize the clinical and social utility of psychiatric genomics, including the following: expanding genomics training among mental health clinicians; establishing practice guidelines that consider potential clinical, psychological, and social implications of psychiatric genomics; promoting an integrated care model for managing genomics in psychiatry; emphasizing patient engagement and informed consent when managing genomic testing in psychiatric care.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelClinical CompetenceGenomicsMental DisordersMental Health ServicesPractice Guidelines as TopicPsychiatryHumans

Identifiers

PMID30614887
PMCPMC6326091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.