Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30614252›Full record

ArticleJournal of diabetes science and technology2019

Development of the Intercultural Diabetes Online Community Research Council: Codesign and Social Media Processes.

Deborah A Greenwood, Michelle L Litchman, Ashley H Ng, Perry M Gee, Heather M Young, Mila Ferrer, Jimmy Ferrer, Chris E Memering, Barbara Eichorst, Renza Scibilia and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Deborah A Greenwood1 Deborah Greenwood Consulting, Granite Bay, CA, USA.
Michelle L Litchman2 University of Utah, College of Nursing, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Ashley H Ng3 La Trobe University, Department of Rehabilitation Nutrition and Sport, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.
Perry M Gee4 Dignity Health, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Heather M Young5 Betty Irene Moore School of Nursing, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Mila Ferrer6 Beyond Type 1, Menlo Park, CA, USA.
Jimmy Ferrer7 Gadija, LLC, Orlando, FL, USA.
Chris E Memering8 CarolinaEast Medical Center, New Bern, NC, USA.
Barbara Eichorst9 Voluntis, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Renza Scibilia10 Diabetes Australia, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Lisa M S Miller11 University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
Carolinas Medical Center · USDiabetes Australia · AUDignity Health · USGreenWood Resources (United States) · USLa Trobe University · AUMenlo School · USUC Davis Health System · USUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis case study describes the formation of the Intercultural Diabetes Online Community Research council (iDOCr) and community advisory board (CAB) to engage the diabetes community and researchers in the codesign of community-based participatory research (CBPR) to examine online peer support in type 2 diabetes (T2D).

methodSocial media engagement was the foundation for CBPR knowledge generation. During the project, the iDOCr council and CAB (n = 27) met quarterly via video conferencing and three times in person during national diabetes meetings. Data from four Twitter chats were used to explore the usefulness and utility of Twitter data to learn about concerns and priorities of the diabetes online community (DOC) and supported the evolution of iDOCr, the development of a research question and the design of a CBPR study.

resultsThe iDOCr project (1) created a diverse CAB; (2) raised awareness of iDOCr and online peer support, which resulted in support and trust from key opinion leaders within the DOC to enable future partnerships for research and funding; (3) engaged with English- and Spanish-speaking DOC users through social media; and (4) designed a CBPR study supported by Twitter chat data analyses.

conclusionsIntegrating the voice of people with diabetes (PWD) and the DOC in designing CBPR, through use of a CAB, ensures the most important and relevant research questions are asked. Additional research focused on online peer support may increase health care provider confidence in referring PWD to this low-cost and relatively accessible resource with the potential power to advance health.

Indexed as

Community-Based Participatory ResearchOnline Social NetworkingPeer InfluenceResearch DesignSocial MediaSocial SupportTelemedicineAttitude to ComputersCultural CharacteristicsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansStakeholder Participationcommunity advisory boarddiabetes online communityonline peer supportpeer supportpeer support community

Identifiers

PMID30614252
PMCPMC6399805
OpenAlexW2909704403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.