ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2019
Biexponential T
Article in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- HSGDNet: Hybrid Synthetic-Data-Guided Deep Learning With NLS Refinement for Fast Multi-Component T1ρ Knee Mapping.NMR in biomedicine · 2025Article
- High angular resolution diffusion imaging (HARDI) of porcine menisci: a comparison of diffusion tensor imaging and generalized q-sampling imaging.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Early detection of myocardial involvement by non-contrast T1ρ mapping of cardiac magnetic resonance in type 2 diabetes mellitus.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
- Pilot study quantifying muscle glycosaminoglycan using bi-exponential TScientific reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMeasuring T PURPOSE: To demonstrate the feasibility of biexponential T STUDY TYPE: Prospective. POPULATION: Eight healthy volunteers with no known inflammation, trauma, or pain in the knee and three symptomatic subjects with early knee OA. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: Customized Turbo-FLASH sequence to acquire 3D-T ASSESSMENT: T STATISTICAL TESTS: Nonparametric rank-sum tests, Kruskal-Wallis test, and coefficient of variation.
resultsThe mean monoexponential T DATA
conclusionOur results showed that in all ROIs, T LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 Technical Efficacy Stage: 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:824-835.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.