Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30614109›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of cancer care2019

Barriers to mammography screening in Nigeria: A survey of two communities with different access to screening facilities.

Olalekan Olasehinde, Olusegun I Alatise, Olukayode A Arowolo, Victoria L Mango, Olalere S Olajide, Adeleye D Omisore, Carla Boutin-Foster, Thomas P Kingham

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of cancer care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Mammography uptake among the female staff of King Saud University.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2020
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Olalekan OlasehindeDepartment of Surgery, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8706-0756
Olusegun I AlatiseDepartment of Surgery, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria.
Olukayode A ArowoloDepartment of Surgery, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria.
Victoria L MangoDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer center, New York, New York.
Olalere S OlajideAIDS Prevention Initiative in Nigeria, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Adeleye D OmisoreDepartment of Radiology, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria.
Carla Boutin-FosterDownstate Medical Center, State University of New York, New York, New York.
Thomas P KinghamDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
African Research Group for OncologyMSKCC Global Cancer Disparity InitiativeNCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748Thompson Family Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Delayed presentation of breast cancer is a common theme in most low- and middle-income countries. This study evaluates barriers to mammography screening in two Nigerian communities with different geographic access to screening facilities. A 35 item questionnaire was administered to women, 40 years and older, 1,169 (52.6%) in Ife Central Local Government where mammography services are offered and 1,053 (47.4%) in Iwo Local Government where there are no mammography units. Information on breast cancer screening practices and barriers to mammography screening were compared between the two communities. Most women had heard of breast cancer (Ife 94%, Iwo 97%), but few were aware of mammography (Ife 11.8%, Iwo 11.4%). Mammography uptake in Ife Central was 2.8% and 1.8% in Iwo, despite the former offering mammography services. Knowledge and practice of mammography were not statistically different between the two communities (p = 0.74, 0.1). Lack of awareness was the commonest reason cited for not having mammography in both communities. Others include lack of perceived need and cost. Awareness creation to ensure optimal utilisation of existing facilities, as well as innovative measures to address the barrier of cost, is required to improve breast cancer screening uptake in Nigeria.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAge DistributionBreast NeoplasmsCancer Care FacilitiesEarly Detection of CancerFacilities and Services UtilizationFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMammographyMiddle AgedNigeriaPatient Acceptance of Health Careaccessbarriersbreastcancermammographyscreening

Identifiers

PMID30614109
PMCPMC6430195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.