Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30613955›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2019

New approaches to measuring the comprehensiveness of primary care physicians.

Ann S O'Malley, Eugene C Rich, Lisa Shang, Tyler Rose, Arkadipta Ghosh, Dmitriy Poznyak, Deborah Peikes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Regional Variation in Scope of Practice by Family Physicians.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Successes, weaknesses, and recommendations to strengthen primary health care: a scoping review.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ann S O'MalleyMathematica Policy Research, Washington, District of Columbia.ORCID 0000-0002-0454-9602
Eugene C RichMathematica Policy Research, Washington, District of Columbia.
Lisa ShangMathematica Policy Research, Baltimore, Maryland.
Tyler RoseMathematica Policy Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Arkadipta GhoshMathematica Policy Research, Princeton, New Jersey.
Dmitriy PoznyakMathematica Policy Research, Princeton, New Jersey.ORCID 0000-0002-9610-8424
Deborah PeikesMathematica Policy Research, Princeton, New Jersey.

Funding

Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services HHSM-500-2010-00026I/HHSM-500-T0006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop claims-based measures of comprehensiveness of primary care physicians (PCPs) and summarize their associations with health care utilization and cost. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY

settingA total of 5359 PCPs caring for over 1 million Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries from 1404 practices. STUDY

designWe developed Medicare claims-based measures of physician comprehensiveness (involvement in patient conditions and new problem management) and used a previously developed range of services measure. We analyzed the association of PCPs' comprehensiveness in 2013 with their beneficiaries' emergency department, hospitalizations rates, and ambulatory care-sensitive condition (ACSC) admissions (each per 1000 beneficiaries per year), and Medicare expenditures (per beneficiary per month) in 2014, adjusting for beneficiary, physician, practice, and market characteristics, and clustering. PRINCIPAL

findingsEach measure varied across PCPs and had low correlation with the other measures-as intended, they capture different aspects of comprehensiveness. For patients whose PCPs' comprehensiveness score was at the 75th vs 25th percentile (more vs less comprehensive), patients had lower service use (P < 0.05) in one or more measures: involvement with patient conditions: total Medicare expenditures, -$17.4 (-2.2 percent); hospitalizations, -5.5 (-1.9 percent); emergency department (ED) visits, -16.3 (-2.4 percent); new problem management: total Medicare expenditures, -$13.3 (-1.7 percent); hospitalizations, -7.0 (-2.4 percent); ED visits, -19.7 (-2.9 percent); range of services: ED visits, -17.1 (-2.5 percent). There were no significant associations between the comprehensiveness measures and ACSC admission rates.

conclusionsThese measures demonstrate strong content and predictive validity and reliability. Medicare beneficiaries of PCPs providing more comprehensive care had lower hospitalization rates, ED visits, and total Medicare expenditures.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overComprehensive Health CareFee-for-Service PlansFemaleHealth ExpendituresHospitalizationHumansInsurance Claim ReviewMaleMedicareOffice VisitsPatient Acceptance of Health CarePhysicians, Primary CarePrimary Health CareQuality Indicators, Health Carecomprehensivenesscostsmeasuresprimary health carequality of careutilization

Identifiers

PMID30613955
PMCPMC6407349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.