Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30613951›Full record

ArticleActa neurologica Scandinavica2019

Perampanel for treatment of status epilepticus in Austria, Finland, Germany, and Spain.

Adam Strzelczyk, Susanne Knake, Reetta Kälviäinen, Estevo Santamarina, Manuel Toledo, Sophia Willig, Alexandra Rohracher, Eugen Trinka, Felix Rosenow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neurologica Scandinavica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pilot Trial of Perampanel on Peritumoral Hyperexcitability in Newly Diagnosed High-grade Glioma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Perampanel as a candidate for polytherapy in Stage 1 Plus status epilepticus: biological rationale and translational limits.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Further advances in epilepsy.Journal of neurology · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Epidemiology, management and outcome of status epilepticus in adults: single-center Italian survey.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Adam StrzelczykDepartment of Neurology, Epilepsy Center Frankfurt Rhine-Main, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6288-9915
Susanne KnakeDepartment of Neurology, Epilepsy Center Hessen, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany.
Reetta KälviäinenSchool of Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Estevo SantamarinaEpilepsy Unit, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
Manuel ToledoEpilepsy Unit, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
Sophia WilligDepartment of Neurology, Epilepsy Center Frankfurt Rhine-Main, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Alexandra RohracherDepartment of Neurology, Christian Doppler Klinik, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Eugen TrinkaDepartment of Neurology, Christian Doppler Klinik, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Felix RosenowDepartment of Neurology, Epilepsy Center Frankfurt Rhine-Main, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveNovel treatments are needed to control treatment-resistant status epilepticus (SE). We report a summary of clinical cases where perampanel was used in established SE, refractory SE (RSE), or super-refractory SE (SRSE).

methodsMedical records were retrospectively reviewed for perampanel administration in SE at five European hospitals between 2011 and 2015.

resultsOf 1319 patients identified as experiencing SE, 52 (3.9%) received perampanel. Median latency from SE onset to perampanel initiation was 10 days. Patients with SE had previously failed benzodiazepines (when received) and a median of five other antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Median initial perampanel dose was 6 mg/d, up-titrated to a median maximum dose of 10 mg/d. Perampanel was the last drug added in 32/52 (61.5%) patients, with response attributed to perampanel in 19/52 (36.5%) patients. A greater proportion of perampanel non-responders had SRSE (51.5%; 17/33) vs perampanel responders (31.6%; 6/19), and had failed a higher mean number of AEDs before initiating perampanel (5.9 vs 5.1, respectively). Most commonly reported adverse effects during perampanel treatment were dizziness (n = 1 [1.9%]) and somnolence (n = 1 [1.9%]). No serious adverse effects were documented, and none led to discontinuation of perampanel.

conclusionsPerampanel was administered to patients with established SE, RSE, or SRSE at greater initial doses than those administered in clinical practice to patients with epilepsy. The SE cases reported here represent a refractory and heterogeneous population, and rate of seizure cessation attributed to perampanel treatment (36.5%) represents a notable response. These data should be confirmed in a larger patient population.

Indexed as

AdultAnticonvulsantsAustriaFemaleFinlandGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedNitrilesPyridonesRetrospective StudiesSeizuresSpainStatus EpilepticusTreatment OutcomeAnticonvulsantsNitrilesperampanelPyridonesAMPAperampanelrefractory status epilepticussummary of casessuper-refractory status epilepticus

Identifiers

PMID30613951
PMCPMC6590284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.