ReviewNeurosurgical review2019
Posterior epidural migration of herniated lumbar disc fragment: a literature review.
Review in Neurosurgical review, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Posterior epidural migration of thoracic and lumbar disc material: a comprehensive 63-year systematic review with anatomical perspectives.Neurosurgical review · 2025Pooled it
- Surgical management of tumor-mimicking posteriorly migrated lumbar disc fragment using a quadrant minimally invasive approach: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- A Rare Case of Posteriorly Migrated Sequestered Lumbar Disc Herniation Through the Interlaminar Space.Reports (MDPI) · 2025Article
- When a herniated disc masquerades as a tumor: Latero-posterior epidural migration mimicking cauda equina neoplasm-A case report and review.Radiology case reports · 2025Article
- Posterior migration of lumbar disc herniation: A case report.Radiology case reports · 2024Article
- Posterior Epidural Migrated Lumbar Disc Fragment at L2-3 Level Mimicking an Extradural Spinal Tumor: A Case Report.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2023Article
- Endplate role in the degenerative disc disease: A brief review.World journal of clinical cases · 2023Review
- Posterior and anterior epidural and intradural migration of the sequestered intervertebral disc: Three cases and review of the literature.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2022Review
- Posterior epidural sequestrated disc presenting with contralateral radiculopathy: a very rare case.Spinal cord series and cases · 2021Article
- Case of anterolateral migration of herniated cervical disc fragment mimicking a spinal meningioma.Surgical neurology international · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Herniated disc fragments' migration to posterior epidural locations is a very rare pathological condition, and the mechanism is not well understood. Posterior epidural migration may lead to serious neurologic problems; however, its diagnosis and treatment are challenging. We searched PubMed and Google Scholar, using various keyword combinations, and found 111 cases of posterior epidural disc migration in the lumbar region reported between 1973 and 2018. There were 89 (80.2%) men and 22 (19.8%) women. The mean age at surgery was 54.05 years (range, 26-83 years); the mean duration of complaints was 26.3 days. The locations were at the L3-L4 level in 41 cases (36.9%), the L4-L5 level in 37 (33.3%), the L2-L3 level in 21 (18.9%), the L5-S1 level in 8 (7.2%), and the L1-L2 in 4 (3.6%). The disc fragment appeared as hypointense and isointense in 60.3% and 33.8%, respectively, of cases in T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and as hyperintense in 68.5% of cases on T2-weighted MRI. The initial symptoms were cauda equina syndrome, radiculopathy, and low back pain in 58 (52.2%), 52 (46.8%), and 12 (10.8%) patients, respectively. In addition, 107 patients (96.4%) underwent surgical treatment and 4 (3.6%) underwent conservative treatments, with total recovery, and subtotal recovery in 73 (65.8%), and 38 (34.2%), respectively. We found significant differences between patients at different ages with regard to the level of disc herniation (η = 0.405, p = .001): patients with a higher level of disc herniation were, on average, older. There was no significant difference in outcome between male and female patients, χ
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.